[1] NOTE:  As provided in LFC policy, this report is intended only for use by the standing finance committees of the legislature.  The Legislative Finance Committee does not assume responsibility for the accuracy of the information in this report when used in any other situation.

 

Only the most recent FIR version (in HTML & Adobe PDF formats) is available on the Legislative Website.  The Adobe PDF version includes all attachments, whereas the HTML version does not.  Previously issued FIRs and attachments may be obtained from the LFC’s office in Suite 101 of the State Capitol Building North.

 

 

F I S C A L   I M P A C T   R E P O R T

 

 

 

SPONSOR:

Duran

 

DATE TYPED:

1/29/02

 

HB

 

 

SHORT TITLE:

Marriage License Fees

 

SB

172

 

 

ANALYST:

J. Sandoval

 

 

REVENUE

 

Estimated Revenue

Subsequent

Years Impact

Recurring

or Non-Rec

Fund

Affected

FY02

FY03

 

 

 

 

NFI

 

Recurring

Children’s Trust Fund

 

 

 

 

 

(Parenthesis ( ) Indicate Revenue Decreases)

 

SOURCES OF INFORMATION

 

LFC files

 

Responses Received From

The Department of Health
Office of the Attorney General

 

SUMMARY

 

Senate Bill 172 amends Section 40-1-11 NMSA 1978 by deleting the mandate that a certificate from a physician regarding tests and examinations as required by regulation of the Health and Environmental Department (Department of Health) be included as part of a marriage license.  This bill also increases the marriage license fee received by the respective County Clerk from twenty-five dollars ($25.00) to forty dollars ($40.00).  The fifteen dollars amount from this fee that is remitted to the State Treasurer for deposit into the children’s trust fund remains unchanged.  

 

     Significant Issues

 

In 1995 the Department of Health chose not to require any medical tests for marriage licenses.  Currently no documents need to be submitted for a marriage license. 

 


FISCAL IMPLICATIONS

 

This bill would increase county revenues by an indeterminate amount.

 

ADMINISTRATIVE IMPLICATIONS

 

None reported.

 

POSSIBLE QUESTIONS

 

  1. What was the original reason for mandating a certificate from a physician regarding tests and examinations as part of a marriage license?
  2. Is the public’s health and safety threatened by not requiring this certificate?
  3. Why was the portion that is to be deposited in the children’s trust fund not increased?

 

JFS/njw


 [1]Begin typing on the * in replace mode.  Do not add or delete spaces.