[1]NOTE:
As provided in LFC policy, this report is intended only for use by the
standing finance committees of the legislature. The Legislative
Finance Committee does not assume responsibility for the accuracy of the information
in this report when used in any other situation.
Only the most recent
FIR version (in HTML & Adobe PDF formats) is available on the Legislative
Website. The Adobe PDF version includes
all attachments, whereas the HTML version does not. Previously issued FIRs and attachments may be obtained from the
LFC’s office in Suite 101 of the State Capitol Building North.
SPONSOR: |
Lyons |
DATE TYPED: |
02/08/02 |
HB |
|
||
SHORT TITLE: |
Contagious Diseases in Gaming Animals |
SB |
151/aSFl#1 |
||||
|
ANALYST: |
Valenzuela |
|||||
APPROPRIATION
Appropriation
Contained |
Estimated
Additional Impact |
Recurring or Non-Rec |
Fund Affected |
||
FY02 |
FY03 |
FY02 |
FY03 |
|
|
|
|
|
$8,200.0 See Narrative |
Recurring |
Game Protection Fund |
(Parenthesis
( ) Indicate Expenditure Decreases)
LFC files
New Mexico Livestock Board
Department of Game and Fish
SUMMARY
Synopsis of SFl#1 Amendment
Synopsis
of Original Bill
Senate Bill 151 adds a new section to the
statute which outlines the duties of the State Game Commission with regard to
the Game Protection Fund. The new section directs the department to promulgate
rules for controlling or eradicating the spread of contagious disease in game
animals. The bill would give the department the authority to mitigate any
problem through quarantine, treatment or destruction of the animals. Senate
Bill 151 would allow DGF to use the Game Protection Fund to purchase the
diseased animals and disinfect the premises where the animals had been housed.
Significant
Issues
Chronic Wasting Disease. This summer, chronic wasting disease was discovered on game ranches in Colorado. The incurable disease, similar to mad cow disease, afflicts elk and deer. Eradication of diseased animals is the only recommended solution to prevent the spread of the disease. Unfortunately, the only manner to determine if an animal has the disease is to sample tissue from the brain stem, which requires that the animal be killed. A gaming ranch in southwestern New Mexico purchased and transported to the state 15 elk from a ranch in Colorado that had infected animals.
According to the agency, the transport met all department regulations and was based on a clean health certificate. The department learned that the Colorado ranch tested positive for the disease shortly after the transport. As a result, DGF banned imports of elk from those states where the disease has been found. It also reimbursed the New Mexico rancher $37.5 for the 15 elk it had to eradicate. The department argues the elk industry in New Mexico generates an estimated $30 million a year, making the purchase of the diseased elk a sound investment. Some hunters, on the other hand, have argued that the game ranches, (who propagate, sell and trade game animals) should shoulder the entire level of risk.
The issue highlights a weakness in the department’s statute, which is silent on the issue of paying producers for eliminating a portion of their herd for the protection of wildlife and, potentially, public health. Senate Bill 151 would clarify the statute in this regard.
Conflicting Authority.
The New Mexico Livestock Board reports that enactment of Senate Bill 151 would
create a conflict in the law regarding the quarantine authority of the State
Veterinarian, who currently has the authority to mitigate animal disease in
livestock or game animals. The agency points to correspondence it has received
from the U.S. Department of Agriculture on the issue of chronic wasting disease
which stated, “. . . the real enforcement of chronic wasting disease will depend
on state law and will actually be carried out by the State Veterinarian.” The
Livestock Board asserts that if SB 151 is enacted, the federal government may
seek similar quarantine authority throughout the state.
FISCAL IMPLICATIONS
Senate Bill 151 does not carry an appropriation.
However, its enactment could have a substantial impact on the Game Protection
Fund. The DGF reports that New Mexico is home to 19 class A game parks and
estimates an average elk population of 108/park. Based on an estimated average
cost per elk of $4000.00, the impact could be $8.2 million. This estimate is
based on the assumption that an outbreak of chronic wasting disease occurred in
New Mexico and the department destroys the entire game park population. The
department also notes that the cost to disinfect a game park could cost $100.0
per park, based on a smaller scale facility; thus, the minimum disinfection
cost could be approximately $1.9 million.
The result of this amount of financial impact to
the Game Protection Fund would be a fee increase.
ADMINISTRATIVE IMPLICATIONS
The administrative impact will be substantial.
The department will have to hold public hearings throughout the state in order
to promulgate the rules.
[1]Begin typing on the * in replace mode. Do not add or delete spaces.