[1]NOTE:
As provided in LFC policy, this report is intended only for use by the
standing finance committees of the legislature. The Legislative
Finance Committee does not assume responsibility for the accuracy of the information
in this report when used in any other situation.
Only the most recent
FIR version (in HTML & Adobe PDF formats) is available on the Legislative
Website. The Adobe PDF version includes
all attachments, whereas the HTML version does not. Previously issued FIRs and attachments may be obtained from the
LFC’s office in Suite 101 of the State Capitol Building North.
SPONSOR: |
Altamirano |
DATE TYPED: |
01/30/02 |
HB |
|
||
SHORT TITLE: |
Eagle Nest Lake Fund |
SB |
127 |
||||
|
ANALYST: |
Valenzuela |
|||||
APPROPRIATION
Appropriation
Contained |
Estimated
Additional Impact |
Recurring or Non-Rec |
Fund Affected |
||
FY02 |
FY03 |
FY02 |
FY03 |
|
|
|
$15,000.0 |
|
|
Non-Recurring |
General Fund |
|
$2,000.0 |
|
|
Non-Recurring |
Game Protection Fund |
|
|
|
$682.1 |
Recurring |
General Fund |
|
|
|
$2,200.0 |
Recurring |
Capital Improvement Funds |
(Parenthesis
( ) Indicate Expenditure Decreases)
REVENUE
Estimated Revenue |
Subsequent Years
Impact |
Recurring or Non-Rec |
Fund Affected |
|
FY02 |
FY03 |
|
|
|
|
$100.0 |
$100.0 |
Recurring |
Park Fees |
|
$17,000.0 |
|
Non-Recurring |
Eagle Nest Lake Fund |
(Parenthesis ( ) Indicate Revenue Decreases)
SUMMARY
Synopsis
of Bill
Senate Bill 127 appropriates $15 million from
the general fund and $2.0 million from the game protection fund into a newly
created fund, the “Eagle Nest Lake” fund. The fund will be administered by the
Energy, Minerals and Natural Resources Department and invested by the State
Investment Council. The bill references a purchase agreement, which has already
been signed by all parties and outlines the term of the sale. The bill allows
for the possibility of a land exchange in lieu of cash payment; however the
purchase agreement does not request this option.
Brief History of Eagle
Nest Lake Acquisition. During the 2000 legislative session, $4 million
was appropriated from the game protection fund for the lease ($1.0 million) and
down-payment for the purchase ($3.0 million) of Eagle Nest Lake. The legislation also authorized the department
to pursue acquisition on behalf of the state. The following year, the
Legislature appropriated $17 million to complete the purchase; however, the
governor vetoed the entire capital appropriations bill, which included the
funding for Eagle Nest Lake.
In the original purchase
agreement, the state had an eight-year option to purchase the lake, whereby the
CS Cattle Company would lease the lake to the state during that period of time.
However, a revised purchase agreement was signed on July 10th, 2001,
by the State Game Commission, which deleted the eight-year lease/purchase
option and restricted the lease to March 31, 2002. Consequently, if funding is
not appropriated in the 2002 legislative session, the lease will expire.
The current purchase agreement is based on $20.0 million purchase price. SB 127 provides $17.0 million. The remainder was appropriated two years ago. There may be an opportunity to replace a portion of the general fund appropriation with a higher level of appropriation from the Game Protection Fund.
Cash Balances of Game
Protection Fund.
Despite a slight drop in revenues, the game protection fund continues to show a
healthy cash balance. As of July 2001, the cash balance was $1.8 million higher
than the same month a year ago although, a variety of obligations against the fund
could drop the cash to a substantially lower amount. After paying these
obligations and keeping a 15 percent reserve level, the fund would continue to
show close to $11 million. The unobligated cash balance represents an
opportunity for the department to fund a higher portion of the Eagle Nest Lake
acquisition or cover all or part of the dam rehabilitation work, discussed in
the following paragraph.
Game
Protection Fund FY00 FY01 FY02
Actuals Actuals Estimated
Beginning
cash balance $ 20,456,706 $ 22,896,746 $ 20,583,348
Revenues 27,285,254
25,238,845 25,705,171
Expenditures (20,313,104)
(22,104,075) (22,017,100)
Other items impacting cash (3,032,110) (2,448,168)
(3,621,000)
End
cash balance $24,396,746
$ 23,583,348
$ 20,650,419
Cash restrictions and obligations (1,500,000) (3,000,000) (3,750,000)
Cash reserve requirement (6,000,000)
Unobligated
cash $ 22,896,746 $ 20,583,348 $ 10,900,419
$6 Million Dam Rehabilitation.
The Office of the State Engineer classifies the 85-yr old dam as a “high-hazard
dam” and has estimated it requires $6.0 million of improvements. The CS Cattle Company contracted with an
engineering company to develop an estimated cost of dam repairs, reporting an
amount of $400.0. Pursuant to the
purchase agreement, the state would shoulder the entire cost of dam
rehabilitation. The Governor has
supported a $6.0 million special appropriation from the general fund for the
State Engineer to complete the needed improvements.
Eagle Nest Lake State Park.
Also in the executive budget, the Governor recommended $639.8 from the general
fund for the State Parks Division (SPD) to support 7.00 FTE to operate a new
state park at Eagle Nest Lake.
Additionally, SPD estimates that it will need $2.2 million for capital improvements
to develop the location into a state park. Based on visitation data from the
Department of Game and Fish, the SPD estimates earned revenue of $19.8. However, SPD has based these revenue
estimates on an average revenue per visitor at $0.79. The average revenue per visitor is conservative, and a more
likely revenue target is $100.0 in earned revenues.
FISCAL IMPLICATIONS
The bill appropriates
$17 million to the newly created Eagle Nest Lake fund: $15 million from the
general fund and $2 million from the game protection fund. As discussed above, the operations of the
new state park is estimated at $639.8.
In addition, the State Engineer would require a level of operating funds
to maintain and operate the dam and has estimated 0.5 FTE additional
staff. The cost for this staff person
approximates to $32.3 in salaries and benefits, $10.0 for miscellaneous
costs. Total operating costs are
therefore $682.1. Finally, an estimated
$2.2 million is needed to develop the location.
The department of game
and fish has had ongoing operations at the lake. Consequently, it does not estimate additional funding
requirements.
ADMINISTRATIVE IMPLICATIONS
Enactment of SB 127 would have an administrative
impact commensurate with that described in the Fiscal Implications section.
[1]Begin typing on the * in replace mode. Do not add or delete spaces.