[1]NOTE:
As provided in LFC policy, this report is intended only for use by the
standing finance committees of the legislature. The Legislative
Finance Committee does not assume responsibility for the accuracy of the information
in this report when used in any other situation.
Only the most recent
FIR version (in HTML & Adobe PDF formats) is available on the Legislative
Website. The Adobe PDF version includes
all attachments, whereas the HTML version does not. Previously issued FIRs and attachments may be obtained from the
LFC’s office in Suite 101 of the State Capitol Building North.
SPONSOR: |
Campos |
DATE TYPED: |
1-29-02 |
HB |
|
||
SHORT TITLE: |
UNM Water Rights Adjudication Study |
SB |
108 |
||||
|
ANALYST: |
Baca |
|||||
APPROPRIATION
Appropriation
Contained |
Estimated
Additional Impact |
Recurring or Non-Rec |
Fund Affected |
||
FY02 |
FY03 |
FY02 |
FY03 |
|
|
|
$50.0 |
|
|
Non-Recurring |
General Fund |
(Parenthesis)
Indicate Expenditure Decreases)
Relates
to Appropriation in The General Appropriation Act HB2
Office of the State Engineer (OSE)
Commission on Higher Education (CHE)
SUMMARY
Synopsis
of Bill
Senate Bill 108 appropriates $50.0 to the UNM School of Law to study and recommend, in cooperation with the State Engineer, a prioritization of existing state court water right adjudications, an assessment of the resource needs of the courts and the State Engineer to expedite completion of adjudications.
Significant
Issues
According to the OSE, this bill
would address a potential major issue facing the court system. However, this bill would fund a study that
is currently being undertaken internally in the State Engineer’s office and has
already been funded using adjudication funds appropriated by the Legislature in
FY2002.
FISCAL IMPLICATIONS
The appropriation of $50.0 contained in this bill is a new recurring expense to the general fund. Any unexpended or unencumbered balance remaining at the end of FY2003 shall revert to the general fund.
PERFORMANCE IMPLICATIONS
According to the OSE, “This bill would fund a study that the State Engineer is already
performing internally. In the last six
months, the State Engineer has developed a strategic plan and prioritized the
state court adjudications to expedite the completion of the adjudications. In
addition, the State Engineer is studying and developing a plan regarding the
needs of the Courts. The State Engineer
has recently contracted with a former Supreme Court Justice and a former
Appeals Court Justice to analyze issues and make recommendations. Preliminary work indicates more study of the
issues is needed. The OSE has
sufficient funding to continue with its current investigations.”
OTHER SUBSTANTIVE ISSUES
The following is provided for information only. It is not intended as a commentary on the merits of the bill:
A request for this program was not included in UNM’s
budget request to the UNM Board of Regents, and thus was not included in the
list of priority projects submitted by UNM to the Commission on Higher
Education for review .
1. How would the proposed study enhance the
efforts now underway at the OSE ?
2, Will this study address any issues not being
considered inthe OSE activities ?
[1]Begin typing on the * in replace mode. Do not add or delete spaces.