[1]NOTE:
As provided in LFC policy, this report is intended only for use by the
standing finance committees of the legislature. The Legislative
Finance Committee does not assume responsibility for the accuracy of the information
in this report when used in any other situation.
Only the most recent
FIR version (in HTML & Adobe PDF formats) is available on the Legislative
Website. The Adobe PDF version includes
all attachments, whereas the HTML version does not. Previously issued FIRs and attachments may be obtained from the
LFC’s office in Suite 101 of the State Capitol Building North.
SPONSOR: |
Garcia |
DATE TYPED: |
01/23/02 |
HB |
|
||
SHORT TITLE: |
3rd Judicial Court Appropriation |
SB |
12 |
||||
|
ANALYST: |
Hayes |
|||||
APPROPRIATION
Appropriation
Contained |
Estimated
Additional Impact |
Recurring or Non-Rec |
Fund Affected |
||
FY02 |
FY03 |
FY02 |
FY03 |
|
|
|
$702.6 |
|
|
Recurring** |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Parenthesis
( ) Indicate Expenditure Decreases)
Administrative Office of the Courts (AOC)
Third Judicial District Court FY03 requested
budget
LFC files
SUMMARY
Synopsis
of Bill
Senate Bill 12
appropriates $702.6 from the general fund to the Third Judicial District Court
to fund 13 base expansions requested in the court’s budget: 1
FTE Grant Accountant, 1 FTE Court clerk IV, 1 FTE Court clerk III, 2 FTE’s
Systems Analyst (one for court regular and the other for Adult Drug Court), 1
FTE Administrative Assistant (Adult Drug Court), 2 FTE’s Court clerk II’s, 1
FTE Domestic Violence Commissioner, 1 FTE Bailiff, 1 FTE Family Counselor
(Juvenile Drug Court), 1 FTE Probation Officer (Juvenile Drug Court), and 1 FTE
Court Monitor.
Significant
Issues
FISCAL IMPLICATIONS
Of the appropriation
total ($702.6), $630.0 contained in this bill is recurring; $72.6 is a
non-recurring expense to the general fund.
Any unexpended or unencumbered balance remaining at the end of FY03
shall revert to the general fund.
POSSIBLE QUESTIONS
1. The Judiciary Automation
Program, referred to as «JID», is responsible for providing computer and
automation services to all of the courts.
Why is the 3rd district requesting two systems analysts positions for
its own court ? Why is the 3rd
district requesting one of these specifically for drug court ? Drug court concerns treatment and court
appearances with the judge ; there is no drug court activity that requires
specialized computer services.
Attachment
[1]Begin typing on the * in replace mode. Do not add or delete spaces.