[1]NOTE:
As provided in LFC policy, this report is intended only for use by the
standing finance committees of the legislature. The Legislative
Finance Committee does not assume responsibility for the accuracy of the information
in this report when used in any other situation.
Only the most recent
FIR version (in HTML & Adobe PDF formats) is available on the Legislative
Website. The Adobe PDF version includes
all attachments, whereas the HTML version does not. Previously issued FIRs and attachments may be obtained from the
LFC’s office in Suite 101 of the State Capitol Building North.
SPONSOR: |
Beam |
DATE TYPED: |
01-28-02 |
HJR |
10 |
||
SHORT TITLE: |
Master Settlement Permanent Fund, CA |
SB |
|
||||
|
ANALYST: |
Neel |
|||||
REVENUE
Estimated Revenue |
Subsequent Years
Impact |
Recurring or Non-Rec |
Fund Affected |
|
FY02 |
FY03 |
|
|
|
|
|
None |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Parenthesis ( ) Indicate Revenue Decreases)
LFC files
Taxation and Revenue Department (TRD).
SUMMARY
Synopsis
of Bill
House Joint Resolution
10 proposes an amendment to the New Mexico Constitution to create a “Master
Settlement Permanent Fund (MSPF) consisting of funds received from the master
settlement agreement with various tobacco manufactures. On July 1 of each year an annual
distribution will be made from the MSPF to the Master Settlement Program Fund
equal to 50 percent of the deposits made to the MSPF from the tobacco
manufacturers in the preceding year or until the amount of the distribution is
equal to or less than 4.7 percent of the average year-end market value of the
master settlement permanent fund in the immediate preceding five years
(December 31). Thereafter, the
distribution from the MSPF to the Master Settlement Program Fund will be the
same as the Land Grant Permanent Fund, which is currently at 4.7 percent of the
average fund balance of the preceding five years.
Monies deposited in
the Tobacco Settlement Permanent Fund and the Tobacco Settlement Program Fund
will be credited to the MSPF and Master Settlement Program Fund respectively.
The amendment will be
submitted to the voters at the next general election in November.
Significant
Issues
HJR 10 shifts language regarding the Tobacco Settlement Permanent Fund (TSPF) currently in statute into the Constitution thereby giving the fund constitutional protection from Legislative appropriation. Currently, in order to appropriate funds from the TSPF the legislature must amend statute. Under the provisions of HJR 10, a constitutional amendment would need to be passed requiring voter approval. HJR 10 also renames the TSPF and the MSPF.
The Legislative Finance Committee’s FY03 budget
recommendation proposes to increases the current $19.5 million
distribution to the Tobacco Settlement Program Fund by an additional $19.5 million,
or to approximately $39 million, for FY03 and FY04. These provisions are
included in HB 8a.
In the master settlement agreement between the states and the tobacco industry, $246 billion will be distributed to the states over the next 25 years, although the agreement stipulates funding into perpetuity. New Mexico’s portion of the settlement totals $1.2 billion for the same period. The balance of the tobacco settlement permanent fund is currently $38 million.
FISCAL IMPLICATIONS
None
TECHNICAL ISSUES
The October estimate for tobacco settlement
revenue was roughly $44 million; the DFA now estimates revenue at $39
million. The reasons for the change are
as follows:
1. Actual
volume adjustments in January have been larger than anticipated.
2. Brown and Williamson (one of the participating manufacturers) has placed over half their initial payment in a escrow account. This manufacturer believes that they are due an adjustment to their payment due to market share gained by non participating manufacturers; this issue will have to be adjudicated.
The DFA notes that there is a possibility that
Phillip Morris may do the same with its annual payment. This would reduce the estimate by an
additional $4 million.
SN/njw
[1]Begin typing on the * in replace mode. Do not add or delete spaces.