[1] NOTE:  As provided in LFC policy, this report is intended only for use by the standing finance committees of the legislature.  The Legislative Finance Committee does not assume responsibility for the accuracy of the information in this report when used in any other situation.

 

Only the most recent FIR version (in HTML & Adobe PDF formats) is available on the Legislative Website.  The Adobe PDF version includes all attachments, whereas the HTML version does not.  Previously issued FIRs and attachments may be obtained from the LFC’s office in Suite 101 of the State Capitol Building North.

 

 

F I S C A L   I M P A C T   R E P O R T

 

 

 

SPONSOR:

Beam

 

DATE TYPED:

01-28-02

 

HJR

10

 

SHORT TITLE:

Master Settlement Permanent Fund, CA

 

SB

 

 

 

ANALYST:

Neel

 

 

REVENUE

 

Estimated Revenue

Subsequent

Years Impact

Recurring

or Non-Rec

Fund

Affected

FY02

FY03

 

 

 

 

 

None

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(Parenthesis ( ) Indicate Revenue Decreases)

 

SOURCES OF INFORMATION

 

LFC files

 

No response received

Taxation and Revenue Department (TRD).

 

SUMMARY

 

     Synopsis of Bill

 

House Joint Resolution 10 proposes an amendment to the New Mexico Constitution to create a “Master Settlement Permanent Fund (MSPF) consisting of funds received from the master settlement agreement with various tobacco manufactures.  On July 1 of each year an annual distribution will be made from the MSPF to the Master Settlement Program Fund equal to 50 percent of the deposits made to the MSPF from the tobacco manufacturers in the preceding year or until the amount of the distribution is equal to or less than 4.7 percent of the average year-end market value of the master settlement permanent fund in the immediate preceding five years (December 31).  Thereafter, the distribution from the MSPF to the Master Settlement Program Fund will be the same as the Land Grant Permanent Fund, which is currently at 4.7 percent of the average fund balance of the preceding five years.      

 

Monies deposited in the Tobacco Settlement Permanent Fund and the Tobacco Settlement Program Fund will be credited to the MSPF and Master Settlement Program Fund respectively.

 

The amendment will be submitted to the voters at the next general election in November.  

 

     Significant Issues

 

HJR 10 shifts language regarding the Tobacco Settlement Permanent Fund (TSPF) currently in statute into the Constitution thereby giving the fund constitutional protection from Legislative appropriation.  Currently, in order to appropriate funds from the TSPF the legislature must amend statute.  Under the provisions of HJR 10, a constitutional amendment would need to be passed requiring voter approval. HJR 10 also renames the TSPF and the MSPF. 

 

The Legislative Finance Committee’s FY03 budget recommendation proposes to increases the current $19.5 million distribution to the Tobacco Settlement Program Fund by an additional $19.5 million, or to approximately $39 million, for FY03 and FY04. These provisions are included in HB 8a.  

 

In the master settlement agreement between the states and the tobacco industry, $246 billion will be distributed to the states over the next 25 years, although the agreement stipulates funding into perpetuity. New Mexico’s portion of the settlement totals $1.2 billion for the same period.  The balance of the tobacco settlement permanent fund is currently $38 million.

 

FISCAL IMPLICATIONS

 

None

 

TECHNICAL ISSUES

 

The October estimate for tobacco settlement revenue was roughly $44 million; the DFA now estimates revenue at $39 million.  The reasons for the change are as follows:

 

1.   Actual volume adjustments in January have been larger than anticipated.

 

2.     Brown and Williamson (one of the participating manufacturers) has placed over half their initial payment in a escrow account.  This manufacturer believes that they are due an adjustment to their payment due to market share gained by non participating manufacturers; this issue will have to be adjudicated.

 

The DFA notes that there is a possibility that Phillip Morris may do the same with its annual payment.  This would reduce the estimate by an additional $4 million.

 

SN/njw

 


 [1]Begin typing on the * in replace mode.  Do not add or delete spaces.