[1]NOTE:
As provided in LFC policy, this report is intended only for use by the
standing finance committees of the legislature. The Legislative
Finance Committee does not assume responsibility for the accuracy of the information
in this report when used in any other situation.
Only the most recent
FIR version (in HTML & Adobe PDF formats) is available on the Legislative
Website. The Adobe PDF version includes
all attachments, whereas the HTML version does not. Previously issued FIRs and attachments may be obtained from the
LFC’s office in Suite 101 of the State Capitol Building North.
SPONSOR: |
Burpo |
DATE TYPED: |
02/11/02 |
HB |
HJM 77/a HEC |
||
SHORT TITLE: |
Procurement Code Compliance |
SB |
|
||||
|
ANALYST: |
J. Sandoval |
|||||
APPROPRIATION
Appropriation
Contained |
Estimated
Additional Impact |
Recurring or Non-Rec |
Fund Affected |
||
FY02 |
FY03 |
FY02 |
FY03 |
|
|
|
NFI |
|
|
|
|
(Parenthesis
( ) Indicate Expenditure Decreases)
No Response
The Department of Finance and Administration
SUMMARY
Synopsis
of HEC Amendment
Only minor technical corrections are made that
do not change or alter the intent of the memorial.
Synopsis of Bill
House Joint Memorial
requests the Attorney General to inform school districts, regional center cooperatives,
state educational institutions, other public post-secondary institutions, joint
powers agreements agencies and other state and local public bodies that they
are required to follow the provisions of the Procurement Code. The Attorney General is also requested to
consider appropriate and meaningful penalties for violations of the Procurement
Code by state or local public bodies and report its recommendation to the first
session of the Forty-Sixth Legislature.
Significant
Issues
According to the New Mexico State Department of
Education, “The purposes of the Procurement Code are to provide for the fair
and equitable treatment of all persons who want to provide goods or services to
publicly funded state and local public bodies and to ensure taxpayers that
their hard-earned dollars are being spent through a procurement system that
safeguards integrity, fairness and value.
While some purchases are exempt from the provisions of the Procurement
Code, and Section 13-1-99 NMSA 1978 excludes certain named public bodies from
purchasing through the state purchasing agent, it does not exempt them from the
provisions of the Procurement Code.”
FISCAL IMPLICATIONS
There is no additional
appropriation to the Office of the Attorney General to carry out this
request. The Office of the Attorney
General has concerns that they will not be able carry out this request without
some form of additional assistance.
ADMINISTRATIVE IMPLICATIONS
According to the
Office of the Attorney General, “It may be difficult for this agency to do much
more public education, beyond what the agency currently handles, without
additional appropriation. This memorial
contains no appropriation. Also, in
order to propose meaningful recommendations, the involvement of the General
Services Department in this matter may also be necessary.”
[1]Begin typing on the * in replace mode. Do not add or delete spaces.