[1]NOTE:
As provided in LFC policy, this report is intended only for use by the
standing finance committees of the legislature. The Legislative
Finance Committee does not assume responsibility for the accuracy of the information
in this report when used in any other situation.
Only the most recent
FIR version (in HTML & Adobe PDF formats) is available on the Legislative
Website. The Adobe PDF version includes
all attachments, whereas the HTML version does not. Previously issued FIRs and attachments may be obtained from the
LFC’s office in Suite 101 of the State Capitol Building North.
SPONSOR: |
Picraux |
DATE TYPED: |
02/07/02 |
HB |
HJM 65 |
||
SHORT TITLE: |
Consolidated Purchasing Single Process |
SB |
|
||||
|
ANALYST: |
J. Sandoval |
|||||
APPROPRIATION
Appropriation
Contained |
Estimated
Additional Impact |
Recurring or Non-Rec |
Fund Affected |
||
FY02 |
FY03 |
FY02 |
FY03 |
|
|
|
NFI |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Parenthesis
( ) Indicate Expenditure Decreases)
No Response
The Department of Finance and Administration
Commission on Higher Education
SUMMARY
House Joint Memorial 65 requests that counties,
municipalities, other political subdivisions and boards of regents of the state
educational institutions to have cost-benefit analyses conducted to determine
if the consolidated purchasing single process is more cost effective for the
purchase of health care benefits. The
bill further asks that those requested above, present their findings and recommendations
on to an appropriate interim committee by October 1, 2002.
[1]Begin typing on the * in replace mode. Do not add or delete spaces.