[1]NOTE:
As provided in LFC policy, this report is intended only for use by the
standing finance committees of the legislature. The Legislative
Finance Committee does not assume responsibility for the accuracy of the information
in this report when used in any other situation.
Only the most recent
FIR version (in HTML & Adobe PDF formats) is available on the Legislative
Website. The Adobe PDF version includes
all attachments, whereas the HTML version does not. Previously issued FIRs and attachments may be obtained from the
LFC’s office in Suite 101 of the State Capitol Building North.
SPONSOR: |
Cordova |
DATE TYPED: |
02/06/02 |
HB |
HJM 62 |
||
SHORT TITLE: |
Study Gambling Addiction |
SB |
|
||||
|
ANALYST: |
Wilson |
|||||
APPROPRIATION
Appropriation
Contained |
Estimated
Additional Impact |
Recurring or Non-Rec |
Fund Affected |
||
FY02 |
FY03 |
FY02 |
FY03 |
|
|
|
|
$0.1 See Narrative |
|
|
|
Gaming Control Board (GCB)
Department of Health (DOH)
SUMMARY
Synopsis
of Bill
House
Joint Memorial 62 requests that the DOH, in cooperation with the GCB and
statewide associations of Indian gaming interests, conduct a study on the cost
and impact of problem gambling addiction on the State of New Mexico and its citizens. Also required is an assessment of resource
needs for the prevention and treatment of problem gambling. A report is due to
the legislative Health and Human Services Committee at its October 2002
meeting.
Significant
Issues
The
State of New Mexico approved a state run lottery in 1996, and casino and slot
machine gambling in 1997. A study was
completed by the University of New Mexico and the DOH Health about
gambling-related problems in 1996. This study determined that there were over
40,000 serious problem gamblers. Since 1996 there have been no published
follow-up studies on how gambling may have affected citizens in the state of
New Mexico, and also how gambling may have affected the various Indian Tribes
who have casinos within their reservations.
FISCAL IMPLICATIONS
HJM
62 does not allocate any funds to conduct this study and the DOH states that it
does not have the resources or expertise in-house to conduct the study.
ADMINISTRATIVE IMPLICATIONS
HJM
62 would have a significant administrative impact on DOH because of the time
and personnel involved in conducting a study on the cost and impact of problem
gambling. The Gaming Control Board is a
regulatory agency, which does not typically conduct studies; therefore, the
majority of the administrative impact of a study such as this would fall on the
DOH. Without additional personnel or
funds to contract for outside consultant expertise, DOH could not complete a
study of this magnitude.
TECHNICAL ISSUES
The GCB states that on Page 2, lines 10 through
14 should be changed to indicate that the DOH has participated in alliance
activities. The alliance referred to is an informal
organization and does not have formal membership requirement.
OTHER SUBSTANTIVE ISSUES
The GCB
explains that the New Mexico Problem Gambling Alliance is an informal
alliance of gaming interests dedicated to dealing with the problem gambling
issues within the state of New Mexico. Participation in the alliance is
voluntary. The alliance formed by New Mexico gaming Tribes is also voluntary
and the Tribes are self- directed with their problem gambling programs and
expenditure of funds dedicated to problem gambling issues. The racetrack and
nonprofit gambling interests have their own programs dedicated to the problem
gambling issues and are also self-directed.
The
DOH has provided the following:
Costs related to gambling addiction may be varied and hard to
quantify. For example, one 1997 study suggested that there may be an
association between gambling and suicide in Las Vegas, Nevada. The study
reported that Las Vegas had the highest levels of suicide in the nation both
for residents and visitors. Visitors and residents of major gaming communities
experience significantly elevated suicide levels. There have been no studies
done on individual level gambling with suicide as an outcome; therefore, the
Department of Health would have difficulty identifying the proportion of
suicides that may be related to gambling. The 1996 DOH study reported an
association between problem gamblers and heavy alcohol consumption. It is
unknown, however, how much of an effect the gambling itself has on drinking, or
whether there are some other factors, which drive both the gambling and the
drinking behavior.
A study on the cost and impact of problem
gambling in New Mexico could be beneficial.
However, a study of this magnitude cannot be conducted by the DOH with
no funding, even in collaboration with the Gaming Control Board, associations
of Indian gaming and other interested parties. A thorough review of literature
and national data on outcomes and costs of gambling may be more in the scope of
this project.
DW/njw:ar
[1]Begin typing on the * in replace mode. Do not add or delete spaces.