[1]NOTE:
As provided in LFC policy, this report is intended only for use by the
standing finance committees of the legislature. The Legislative
Finance Committee does not assume responsibility for the accuracy of the information
in this report when used in any other situation.
Only the most recent
FIR version (in HTML & Adobe PDF formats) is available on the Legislative
Website. The Adobe PDF version includes
all attachments, whereas the HTML version does not. Previously issued FIRs and attachments may be obtained from the
LFC’s office in Suite 101 of the State Capitol Building North.
SPONSOR: |
Stewart |
DATE TYPED: |
01/30/02 |
HJM |
44 |
||
SHORT TITLE: |
Permanent School Fund Distribution |
SB |
|
||||
|
ANALYST: |
Neel |
|||||
REVENUE
Estimated Revenue |
Subsequent Years
Impact |
Recurring or Non-Rec |
Fund Affected |
|
FY02 |
FY03 |
|
|
|
|
$0.1 See Narrative |
$0.1 See Narrative |
Recurring |
Land
Grant Permanent
Fund |
(Parenthesis ( ) Indicate Revenue Decreases)
Companion to HJR 15
State Investment Council (SIC)
LFC Files
SUMMARY
Synopsis
of Bill
House Joint Memorial 44 requests the Congress of
the United States to consent to the amendment of the New Mexico Constitution to
increase the annual distribution from the Land Grant Permanent Fund (LGPF) from
4.7 percent to 6 percent. The land
grants are held in trust for the beneficiaries and distributions from the fund
are made as provided in Article 12 Section 7 of the New Mexico Constitution.
Significant
Issues
The Enabling Act for New Mexico and Article 21,
Section 9 and Article 19, Section 4 of the New Mexico Constitution requires the
consent of the United States Congress for increased distributions from the
LGPF.
According
to the SIC, it is highly probable that the extra distributions will not allow
the LGPF to keep pace with inflation and the purchasing power of the LGPF will
decrease over time. In addition,
although the public schools will see increased distributions under the new
formula versus the existing formula, the difference will decrease over
time. In FY 2028 and future years, the
difference in the two formulas will invert, i.e. the annual distributions will
be less under the new formula than they would be under the current 4.7%
formula. Also, the fund will lose value
in real terms (i.e. adjusted for inflation).
SN/ar
Attachment
[1]Begin typing on the * in replace mode. Do not add or delete spaces.