[1]NOTE:
As provided in LFC policy, this report is intended only for use by the
standing finance committees of the legislature. The Legislative
Finance Committee does not assume responsibility for the accuracy of the information
in this report when used in any other situation.
Only the most recent
FIR version (in HTML & Adobe PDF formats) is available on the Legislative
Website. The Adobe PDF version includes
all attachments, whereas the HTML version does not. Previously issued FIRs and attachments may be obtained from the
LFC’s office in Suite 101 of the State Capitol Building North.
SPONSOR: |
Martinez |
DATE TYPED: |
01/28/02 |
HB |
HJM 23 |
||
SHORT TITLE: |
Abandoned Mining Operations |
SB |
|
||||
|
ANALYST: |
Valenzuela |
|||||
APPROPRIATION
Appropriation
Contained |
Estimated
Additional Impact |
Recurring or Non-Rec |
Fund Affected |
||
FY02 |
FY03 |
FY02 |
FY03 |
|
|
|
|
$0.1 Indeterminate |
Non-Recurring |
General Fund |
|
(Parenthesis
( ) Indicate Expenditure Decreases)
Duplicates/Relates
to Appropriation in The General Appropriation Act
LFC files
Energy, Minerals and Natural Resources
Department (EMNRD)
State Land Office
Department of Environment (DOE)
SUMMARY
Synopsis
of Bill
House Joint Memorial 23 requests the department
of environment to develop a comprehensive evaluation and assessment of the
required remediation of abandoned mine sites in Cibola and McKinley counties.
HJM 23 directs the department to present its findings to the appropriate 2002
legislative interim committee, which would be the Water and Natural Resources
Committee.
Significant
Issues
Mining in both the Cibola and McKinley counties
has a long history. The primary types of mines in these areas are coal or
uranium mines. However, companies continue to produce perlite and gypsum, as
well as crushed stone and sand/gravel for highway construction.
The joint memorial would require a considerable
effort not only on the part of the Department of Environment but on other state
and federal agencies. At the federal level, the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory
Commission, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, and the U.S. Department
of the
Interior have an interest in uranium and coal
production, whether from underground or surface production. At the state level,
the Energy, Minerals and Natural Resources Department regulates coal mining and
reclamation, but also manages an abandoned mine land program, which focus is
mine safety and stabilization. Depending on the land ownership mix, the State
Land Office could have a role as well as the Natural Resources Trustee in
recovering damages on behalf of New Mexicans.
Though the memorial does not carry an
appropriation, it would have a fiscal impact on each of the agencies that would
be involved in the evaluation. The amount of impact is indeterminate, however,
because none of the agencies estimated its potential costs. The cost,
presumably, would be a reallocation of existing resources. The Department of
Environment has stated that it would be hard pressed to shift its resources to
address the provisions of this joint memorial because of ongoing environmental
assessments of hard rock mines throughout New Mexico.
ADMINISTRATIVE IMPLICATIONS
There would be an administrative impact on the
agencies involved, who would have to divert its existing resources to meet the
provisions of this joint memorial.
MFV/ar
[1]Begin typing on the * in replace mode. Do not add or delete spaces.