[1] NOTE:  As provided in LFC policy, this report is intended only for use by the standing finance committees of the legislature.  The Legislative Finance Committee does not assume responsibility for the accuracy of the information in this report when used in any other situation.

 

Only the most recent FIR version (in HTML & Adobe PDF formats) is available on the Legislative Website.  The Adobe PDF version includes all attachments, whereas the HTML version does not.  Previously issued FIRs and attachments may be obtained from the LFC’s office in Suite 101 of the State Capitol Building North.

 

 

F I S C A L   I M P A C T   R E P O R T

 

 

 

SPONSOR:

Martinez

 

DATE TYPED:

01/28/02

 

HB

HJM 23

 

SHORT TITLE:

Abandoned Mining Operations

 

SB

 

 

 

ANALYST:

Valenzuela

 

APPROPRIATION

 

Appropriation Contained

Estimated Additional Impact

Recurring

or Non-Rec

Fund

Affected

FY02

FY03

FY02

FY03

 

 

 

 

$0.1    Indeterminate

Non-Recurring

General Fund

 

(Parenthesis ( ) Indicate Expenditure Decreases)

 

Duplicates/Relates to Appropriation in The General Appropriation Act

 

SOURCES OF INFORMATION

 

LFC files

Energy, Minerals and Natural Resources Department (EMNRD)

State Land Office

Department of Environment (DOE)

 

SUMMARY

 

     Synopsis of Bill

 

House Joint Memorial 23 requests the department of environment to develop a comprehensive evaluation and assessment of the required remediation of abandoned mine sites in Cibola and McKinley counties. HJM 23 directs the department to present its findings to the appropriate 2002 legislative interim committee, which would be the Water and Natural Resources Committee.

 

     Significant Issues

 

Mining in both the Cibola and McKinley counties has a long history. The primary types of mines in these areas are coal or uranium mines. However, companies continue to produce perlite and gypsum, as well as crushed stone and sand/gravel for highway construction.

 

The joint memorial would require a considerable effort not only on the part of the Department of Environment but on other state and federal agencies. At the federal level, the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, and the U.S. Department of the

 

Interior have an interest in uranium and coal production, whether from underground or surface production. At the state level, the Energy, Minerals and Natural Resources Department regulates coal mining and reclamation, but also manages an abandoned mine land program, which focus is mine safety and stabilization. Depending on the land ownership mix, the State Land Office could have a role as well as the Natural Resources Trustee in recovering damages on behalf of New Mexicans.

 

FISCAL IMPLICATIONS

 

Though the memorial does not carry an appropriation, it would have a fiscal impact on each of the agencies that would be involved in the evaluation. The amount of impact is indeterminate, however, because none of the agencies estimated its potential costs. The cost, presumably, would be a reallocation of existing resources. The Department of Environment has stated that it would be hard pressed to shift its resources to address the provisions of this joint memorial because of ongoing environmental assessments of hard rock mines throughout New Mexico.

 

ADMINISTRATIVE IMPLICATIONS

 

There would be an administrative impact on the agencies involved, who would have to divert its existing resources to meet the provisions of this joint memorial.

 

MFV/ar


 [1]Begin typing on the * in replace mode.  Do not add or delete spaces.