[1]NOTE:
As provided in LFC policy, this report is intended only for use by the
standing finance committees of the legislature. The Legislative
Finance Committee does not assume responsibility for the accuracy of the information
in this report when used in any other situation.
Only the most recent
FIR version (in HTML & Adobe PDF formats) is available on the Legislative
Website. The Adobe PDF version includes
all attachments, whereas the HTML version does not. Previously issued FIRs and attachments may be obtained from the
LFC’s office in Suite 101 of the State Capitol Building North.
SPONSOR: |
Sanchez |
DATE TYPED: |
02/05/02 |
HB |
420 |
||
SHORT TITLE: |
Senior Prescription Drug Program |
SB |
|
||||
|
ANALYST: |
Carrillo |
|||||
APPROPRIATION
Appropriation Contained |
Estimated Additional Impact |
Recurring or Non-Rec |
Fund Affected |
||
FY02 |
FY03 |
FY02 |
FY03 |
|
|
|
|
|
$0.1 See Narrative |
Recurring |
Senior Prescription Drug
Fund |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Parenthesis ( ) Indicate
Expenditure Decreases)
REVENUE
Estimated Revenue |
Subsequent Years
Impact |
Recurring or Non-Rec |
Fund Affected |
|
FY02 |
FY03 |
|
|
|
|
$4,000.0 |
|
Recurring |
Senior Prescription Drug Fund |
|
$0.1
– See Narrative |
|
Recurring |
General Fund |
(Parenthesis ( ) Indicate Revenue Decreases)
Duplicates SB91
Relates to HB24, HB200, HB149, HB264, HB334
HJM41, HJM21, HJM49, HJM80, SB22, SB82,
SB91, SB253, SB118, SB238, SB263, SJM23, SJM22, SJM35
Retiree Health Care Authority
Public Schools Insurance Authority
General Services Department
Health Policy Commission
Department of Health
LFC Files
SUMMARY
Synopsis
of Bill
House Bill 420, Senior
Prescription Drug Program, proposes to amend the Retiree Health Care Act to
provide for a senior prescription drug program. The bill establishes the Senior Prescription Drug Program
Fund.
The Retiree Health Care Authority (RCHA) will
administer the senior prescription drug program in conjunction with or through
the consolidated purchasing process pursuant to the Health Care Purchasing Act.
The eligibility criteria set forth in HB 200 is:
A qualifying senior will pay an annual
enrollment fee not to exceed $60.00.
The RHCA will collect and use the enrollment fees for program
administration costs.
The amount a qualifying senior pays for a
prescription drug shall not exceed the total cost of the dispensing fee plus
the contracted discounted price made available to the authority. (Note:
The retail pharmacy industry refers to this type of plan as a 100
percent copay program).
Significant
Issues
The Public School
Insurance Authority (PSIA) staff explains the consolidated purchasing power of
the RHCA, PSIA, Risk Management Division (RMD), and the Albuquerque Public
Schools (APS) group resulted in significant discounts for prescription
costs. The rates, discounts, and in
some cases rebates, were possible because of the plan design and formulary
negotiated with a pharmacy benefit manager (PBM) and a network of
pharmacies. The negotiated rates are
based on the claims processed (utilization) for the members of RHCA, PSIA, RMD,
and APS.
The current PBM cautions the network pharmacies
agreed to provide the rates, discounts and rebates for members of the RHCA,
PSIA, RMD, and APS, not for participants in a 100 percent copay plan. The current contracted PBM has a separate
agreement with its network pharmacies for a 100 percent copay program, and it
is those rates that would be in effect for the RHCA proposed senior prescription
drug program. The current PBM also
explains rebates from drug manufacturers for 100 percent copay plans are not
available.
FISCAL IMPLICATIONS
The bill creates the
Senior Prescription Drug Program Fund, but does not provide for an annual appropriation
by the legislature. Based on data from
the State Agency on Aging and the U. S. Census Bureau, the Health Policy
Commission (HPC) staff notes there are an estimated 68,000 to 110,000 seniors
that may participate in the senior prescription drug program. Depending on the number that enroll, between
$4 million and $6.6 million annual revenue could be generated and deposited
into the Senior Prescription Drug Program Fund. Any interest earned on the deposited amount would be credited to
the general fund.
ADMINISTRATIVE IMPLICATIONS
The RHCA staff states
additional FTE will be required to administer the senior program prescription
drug program.
DUPLICATION/RELATIONSHIP
Senate Bill 91, Senior
Prescription Drug Benefit.
Relates to: House Bill 24, Statewide Rural Health
House Bill 200, Senior
Prescription Drug Program
House Bill 264,
Prescription Drug Fair Pricing Act
House Bill 149, Native
American Prescription Drug Program
House Bill 334,
Prescription Drug Price Reporting
House Joint Memorial 41,
Tax Credit to Offset Prescription Drug Costs
House Joint Memorial 21,
Federal “Best Price” of Prescription Drugs
House Joint Memorial 49,
Study Multistate Purchasing Cooperatives
Senate
Bill 22, Statewide Rural Health
Senate
Bill 82, Mental Health Services
Senate
Bill 91, Senior Prescription Drug Benefit
Senate
Bill 253, Pharmaceutical Supplemental Rebate Act
Senate
Bill 118, Prescription Drug Outreach for Seniors
Senate
Bill 238, Fair Market Drug Pricing Act
Senate
Bill 263, Prescription Drugs Price Reporting
TECHNICAL ISSUES
Consideration should be to (1) including an
effective date and (2) subjecting the Senior Prescription Drug Fund to annual
appropriation by the legislature.
PSIA staff suggests clarifying the wording in
paragraph D to read, “shall not exceed the total cost of the dispensing fee
plus the contracted discounted price made available to the authority for this
group of seniors.”
The Health Policy Commission staff suggests
considering broadening the criteria to include seniors who have reached the
limit of their supplemental benefit coverage.
OTHER SUBSTANTIVE ISSUES
Information provided
by Health Policy Commission staff:
WJC/njw
[1]Begin typing on the * in replace mode. Do not add or delete spaces.