[1]NOTE:
As provided in LFC policy, this report is intended only for use by the
standing finance committees of the legislature. The Legislative
Finance Committee does not assume responsibility for the accuracy of the information
in this report when used in any other situation.
Only the most recent
FIR version (in HTML & Adobe PDF formats) is available on the Legislative
Website. The Adobe PDF version includes
all attachments, whereas the HTML version does not. Previously issued FIRs and attachments may be obtained from the
LFC’s office in Suite 101 of the State Capitol Building North.
SPONSOR: |
Stewart |
DATE TYPED: |
02/04/02 |
HB |
333 |
||
SHORT TITLE: |
Increase Public Accountant Exam Fees |
SB |
|
||||
|
ANALYST: |
Sandoval |
|||||
REVENUE
Estimated Revenue |
Subsequent Years
Impact |
Recurring or Non-Rec |
Fund Affected |
|
FY02 |
FY03 |
|
|
|
|
|
$167.0 Beginning
in FY04 |
Recurring |
OSF/Public Accountancy Fund |
(Parenthesis ( ) Indicate Revenue
Decreases)
Relates to HB 333
Duplicates SB 266
SUMMARY
House Bill 333 amends the Public Accountancy Act
by increasing the cap on examination fees from one hundred seventy-five dollars
($175.00) to two hundred twenty-five dollars ($225.00).
FISCAL IMPLICATIONS
The increased revenue to the Public Accountancy
Board would allow the board to cover the growing costs of the Uniform CPA
Examination.
OTHER SUBSTANTIVE ISSUES
Over 80 percent of exam fees are pass through money. The money is collected on behalf of the candidate and passed through to the national CPA exam providers. The remaining fees are specifically for board exam administration costs.
1. Why
are the costs for taking the CPA exam increasing?
2. House Bill 333 increases the cap on fees that the may be
charged. How much of an increase is
anticipated for the actual fees charged?
3. How will the increase in fees be implemented by the
Public Accountancy Board?
[1]Begin typing on the * in replace mode. Do not add or delete spaces.