[1] NOTE:  As provided in LFC policy, this report is intended only for use by the standing finance committees of the legislature.  The Legislative Finance Committee does not assume responsibility for the accuracy of the information in this report when used in any other situation.

 

Only the most recent FIR version (in HTML & Adobe PDF formats) is available on the Legislative Website.  The Adobe PDF version includes all attachments, whereas the HTML version does not.  Previously issued FIRs and attachments may be obtained from the LFC’s office in Suite 101 of the State Capitol Building North.

 

 

F I S C A L   I M P A C T   R E P O R T

 

 

 

SPONSOR:

Whitaker

 

DATE TYPED:

02/05/02

 

HB

299

 

SHORT TITLE:

Mobile Telecommunications Services Taxes

 

SB

 

 

 

ANALYST:

Valenzuela

 

APPROPRIATION

 

Appropriation Contained

Estimated Additional Impact

Recurring

or Non-Rec

Fund

Affected

FY02

FY03

FY02

FY03

 

 

 

 

NFI

 

 

 

 

(Parenthesis ( ) Indicate Expenditure Decreases)

 

SOURCES OF INFORMATION

 

LFC files

General Services Department (GSD)

Public Regulation Commission (PRC)

 

SUMMARY

 

     Synopsis of Bill

 

House Bill 299 aligns New Mexico statutes to conform with the federal law regarding taxation of mobile telecommunication services.

 

     Significant Issues

 

Many state tax laws applicable to the telecommunication services were written to conform to a U.S. Supreme Court’s decision in Goldberg v. Sweet case, where the court ruled that for states to have jurisdiction to impose taxes on interstate telecommunications, the call must either originate or terminate in a given state and the service address to which the call is charged must also be in that state. The complexity of applying the Goldberg method to wireless telecommunications arises from the inherent difficulty in identifying the precise location from which a call is placed.

 

In July 2000, Congress approved the Mobile Telecommunications Sourcing Act (Public Law 106-252, codified at 4 U.S.C Sections 116 through 126).  House Bill 299 recognizes that the Mobile Telecommunications Sourcing Act was passed to establish sourcing requirements for state and local taxation of mobile telecommunication services. In general, the bill provides that taxes on mobile

 

telecommunications services shall be collected  and remitted to the jurisdiction where the customer's primary use of the services occurs, irrespective of where the mobile telecommunications services originate, terminate, or pass through.

 

FISCAL IMPLICATIONS

 

House Bill 299 does not carry an appropriation. Both the PRC and GSD state that enactment of the bill will have no fiscal or administrative impact on the agencies.

 

MFV/njw:ar


 [1]Begin typing on the * in replace mode.  Do not add or delete spaces.