[1] NOTE:  As provided in LFC policy, this report is intended only for use by the standing finance committees of the legislature.  The Legislative Finance Committee does not assume responsibility for the accuracy of the information in this report when used in any other situation.

 

Only the most recent FIR version (in HTML & Adobe PDF formats) is available on the Legislative Website.  The Adobe PDF version includes all attachments, whereas the HTML version does not.  Previously issued FIRs and attachments may be obtained from the LFC’s office in Suite 101 of the State Capitol Building North.

 

 

F I S C A L   I M P A C T   R E P O R T

 

 

 

SPONSOR:

Watchman

 

DATE TYPED:

01/31/02

 

HB

227

 

SHORT TITLE:

In-Plant Training Residency Requirements

 

SB

 

 

 

ANALYST:

Woodlee

 

APPROPRIATION

 

Appropriation Contained

Estimated Additional Impact

Recurring

or Non-Rec

Fund

Affected

FY02

FY03

FY02

FY03

 

 

 

NFI

NFI

 

 

 

 

(Parenthesis ( ) Indicate Expenditure Decreases)

 

Duplicates HB 281

Relates to  HB 7, SB 142 and SB 217

 

SOURCES OF INFORMATION

 

Economic Development Department

 

SUMMARY

 

     Synopsis of Bill

 

House Bill 227 amends Section 21-19-7 NMSA 1978 to change the size of a project located within fifty miles of the New Mexico border that would qualify for an exception to the In-Plant Training residency requirement from 1,500 employees to 150 employees.

 

     Significant Issues

 

Currently, the statute requires that employees receiving training that is funded by the Development Training Fund must be New Mexico residents.  This requirement is waived if the project:

 


1.               Is located within fifty mile of the New Mexico border where the resident labor force is not sufficient;

 

2.               Gives preference to New Mexico workers;

3.               Employs no less than fifty percent of the project’s workforce with New Mexico residents; and

4.               Employs more than one thousand five hundred (1,500) employees.

 

This bill proposes to amend the last requirement to be only one hundred fifty (150) employees.

 

FISCAL IMPLICATIONS

 

There is no appropriation or significant fiscal implication associated with this bill.

 

MW/ar


 [1]Begin typing on the * in replace mode.  Do not add or delete spaces.