[1]NOTE:
As provided in LFC policy, this report is intended only for use by the
standing finance committees of the legislature. The Legislative
Finance Committee does not assume responsibility for the accuracy of the information
in this report when used in any other situation.
Only the most recent
FIR version (in HTML & Adobe PDF formats) is available on the Legislative
Website. The Adobe PDF version includes
all attachments, whereas the HTML version does not. Previously issued FIRs and attachments may be obtained from the
LFC’s office in Suite 101 of the State Capitol Building North.
SPONSOR: |
Heaton |
DATE TYPED: |
01/31/02 |
HB |
164 |
||
SHORT TITLE: |
Aggravated Fleeing an Officer |
SB |
|
||||
|
ANALYST: |
Hayes |
|||||
APPROPRIATION
Appropriation
Contained |
Estimated
Additional Impact |
Recurring or Non-Rec |
Fund Affected |
||
FY02 |
FY03 |
FY02 |
FY03 |
|
|
|
NFI |
|
|
|
|
(Parenthesis
( ) Indicate Expenditure Decreases)
Relates
to SB138
Administrative Office of the Courts (AOC)
Taxation and Revenue Department (TRD)
Attorney General’s Office (AGO)
Public Defender Department (PDD)
Department of Public Safety (DPS)
New Mexico State Highway and Transportation
Department (SHTD)
SUMMARY
Synopsis
of Bill
The
bill adds a new section to the Criminal Code regarding aggravated fleeing of an
officer and providing for penalties. A
person is guilty of aggravated evading of an officer if a person drives his
vehicle carelessly and heedlessly in willful or wanton disregard of the rights
or safety of others, without due caution and circumspection and at a speed or
in a manner which may endanger another person or property, after being given a
visual or audible signal to stop, whether by hand, voice, emergency light,
flashing light, siren or other signal by a uniformed officer in an appropriately
marked police vehicle.
The
penalty for committing aggravated evading of an officer is a fourth degree felony.
The effective date of
this act is July 1, 2002.
Significant
Issues
FISCAL IMPLICATIONS
There is no fiscal impact.
ADMINISTRATIVE IMPLICATIONS
Both the courts and
the Public Defender Department state that the impact of this bill on their
respective agencies would be proportional to the enforcement of this law. Typically, new laws and amendments to
existing laws have the potential to increase caseloads in the courts. According to PDD, creating a new felony from
what was previously a misdemeanor could impact the department’s obligation to
try matters that formerly have been pled or settled with less punitive terms.
RELATIONSHIP
SB138 enacts the Law
Enforcement Safe Enforcement Safe Pursuit Act regarding high-speed chases.
TECHNICAL ISSUES
The phrase “by a uniformed officer in an
appropriately marked vehicle” could be problematic if this legislation is
approved as written. It seems to
suggest that the new law would not apply in cases where officers pursue
suspects in unmarked vehicles. To
clarify and broaden the intent, here is suggested language for page 2, line
1: “… by any sworn law enforcement
officer in the legal pursuit of his/her duties.”
POSSIBLE QUESTIONS
1. What are the legal and social goals of
requesting that the crime of “aggravated fleeing an officer” be defined and prosecuted as a fourth
degree felony?
[1]Begin typing on the * in replace mode. Do not add or delete spaces.