[1]NOTE:
As provided in LFC policy, this report is intended only for use by the
standing finance committees of the legislature. The Legislative
Finance Committee does not assume responsibility for the accuracy of the information
in this report when used in any other situation.
Only the most recent
FIR version (in HTML & Adobe PDF formats) is available on the Legislative
Website. The Adobe PDF version includes
all attachments, whereas the HTML version does not. Previously issued FIRs and attachments may be obtained from the
LFC’s office in Suite 101 of the State Capitol Building North.
SPONSOR: |
Stewart |
DATE TYPED: |
01/24/02 |
HB |
66 |
||
SHORT TITLE: |
Education-Related Fiscal Study |
SB |
|
||||
|
ANALYST: |
Baca |
|||||
APPROPRIATION
Appropriation
Contained |
Estimated
Additional Impact |
Recurring or Non-Rec |
Fund Affected |
||
FY02 |
FY03 |
FY02 |
FY03 |
|
|
$420.0 |
|
|
|
Non-Recurring |
General Fund |
(Parenthesis)
Indicate Expenditure Decreases)
Duplicates
SB 72
Relates
to SJM 12 and HJM 9
State Department of Education (SDE)
LFC Files
SUMMARY
Synopsis
of Bill
House Bill 66
appropriates $420.0 from the general fund for expenditure during FY2002 and
FY2003 as follows:
1. $150.0 to the Legislative Education Study Committee (LESC) to pay per diem and mileage expenses and other costs of the LESC Ad Hoc Committee on Education reform,
2. $120.0 to contract for an independent study of the effect of the instruction staff training and experience index on the proposed professional educator licensing and salary system and state equalization guarantee distribution, and
3. $150.0
to the Legislative Council Service (LCS) to contract for an independent study
of the land grant permanent fund and the severance tax permanent fund and other
funding options to secure a permanent revenue source to fund education reform
measures and to investigate anticipated
long-term economic and social gains to the state resulting from the increased economic and social contributions of citizens education higher standards as formulated in the 2001 education reform proposals.
Significant
Issues
The SDE analysis states that the two independent
studies called for in HB 66 were included in
HB 82 and SB 307, the bills introduced during
the 2001 Legislative Session to provide funding for the educational reforms
contained in HB 81 and SB 308. These
were the reform bills that resulted from the work of the Education Initiatives
and Accountability Task Force.
FISCAL IMPLICATIONS
The appropriation of
$420.0 contained in this bill is a non-recurring expense to the fund. Any unexpended
or unencumbered balance remaining at the end of FY2003 shall revert to the
general fund.
ADMINISTRATIVE IMPLICATIONS
SDE reports there will
be no significant impact on the agency.
DUPLICATION\RELATIONSHIP
House Bill 66 is
identical to Senate Bill 72 and relates to SJM 12, Continue Ad Hoc Reform Committee,
and HJM 9, Continue Education Reform Ad Hoc Committee.
LB/ar
[1]Begin typing on the * in replace mode. Do not add or delete spaces.