[1]NOTE: As
provided in LFC policy, this report is intended for use by the standing
finance committees of the legislature. The Legislative Finance
Committee does not assume responsibility for the accuracy of the information
in this report when used in any other situation.
Only the most recent FIR
version, excluding attachments, is available on the Intranet. Previously issued FIRs and attachments may
be obtained from the LFC office in Suite 101 of the State Capitol Building
North.
SPONSOR: |
Moore |
DATE TYPED: |
01/18/02 |
HB |
20 |
||
SHORT TITLE: |
Ft. Sumner Irrigation District Debt |
SB |
|
||||
|
ANALYST: |
Chabot |
|||||
APPROPRIATION
Appropriation Contained |
Estimated Additional Impact |
Recurring or Non-Rec |
Fund Affected |
||
FY02 |
FY03 |
FY02 |
FY03 |
|
|
|
$1,200.0 |
|
|
Non-Rec |
General Fund |
Office of the State Engineer
SUMMARY
Synopsis
of Bill
This bill appropriates $1,200.0 from the general
fund to the Office of the State Engineer/Interstate Stream Commission for the
purpose of paying the outstanding debt of the Fort Sumner Irrigation District
to the United States Bureau of Reclamation (BOR).
Significant
Issues
The Fort
Sumner Irrigation District has a 1903 priority water right for diversion of 100
cubic-feet-per-second of water at its Pecos River diversion dam. After its diversion was destroyed by floods,
the District contracted with BOR in 1948 to rebuild the diversion dam and
provide improvements to the canal system.
Repayment was for an extended period; however, in 2000, BOR ordered the
district to reduce their diversion and leave a specified flow in the river for
endangered fish. BOR provided written
notice that it would take control of the diversion if the district failed to
comply. Justification for the action
was a clause in the repayment contract that allows BOR to take control of the
operation of the district’s facilities with six months notice if the district
does not operate its irrigation system as dictated by BOR. After intervention by the New Mexico congressional
delegation, BOR elected to lease water rather than pursue taking over operation
of the district facilities. The issue
did not arise in 2001; however, paying off the district’s debt would mitigate
federal claims that they can dictate the use of water in the district.
FISCAL IMPLICATIONS
The appropriation of $1,200.0 contained in this
bill is a non-recurring expense to the general fund. Any unexpended or
unencumbered balance remaining at the end of 2003 shall revert to the general
fund.
[1]Begin typing on the * in replace mode. Do not add or delete spaces.