NOTE: As provided in LFC policy, this report is intended for use by the standing finance committees of the legislature. The Legislative Finance Committee does not assume responsibility for the accuracy of the information in this report when used in any other situation.
Only the most recent FIR version, excluding attachments, is available on the Intranet. Previously issued FIRs and attachments may be obtained from the LFC office in Suite 101 of the State Capitol Building North.
SPONSOR: | Boitano | DATE TYPED: | 02/02/01 | HB | |||
SHORT TITLE: | Limit Number of Bills Introduced | SB | SCR 2 | ||||
ANALYST: | Burch |
Recurring
or Non-Rec |
Fund
Affected | ||||
FY01 | FY02 | FY01 | FY02 | ||
** |
(Parenthesis ( ) Indicate Expenditure Decreases)
See Fiscal Implications Section of this report.
SOURCES OF INFORMATION
LFC files.
SUMMARY
Synopsis of Bill
Senate Concurrent Resolution 2 proposes a new joint rule, 11-1, to limit the number of bills introduced by: (1) senators to no more than 15 each; and (2) representatives to no more than 9 each. Excluded from each member's total are two bills endorsed by an interim legislative committee, bills requested by the governor or a state agency, simple or joint memorials and resolutions. These limitations may be suspended in either house by a vote in that house. A legislator may allocate any part of his allotment for bills to another member of the same house.
This translates to 630 bills introduced in each house, not counting committee-sponsored bills, governor or state agency bills and simple joint memorials and resolutions. It is assumed that capital outlay requests are also not included in the count.
SIGNIFICANT ISSUES/FISCAL IMPLICATIONS
Currently, there is no limit on the number of bills introduced. Following is a table of the number of bills introduced during the last 6 years for the regular sessions:
Bill Type |
1995
60 Days |
1996
30 Days |
1997
60 Days |
1998
30 Days |
1999
60 Days |
2000
30 Days |
House bills | 1,188 | 793 | 1,392 | 544 | 929 | 540 |
House concurrent resolutions | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
House joint resolutions | 14 | 19 | 19 | 22 | 25 | 20 |
House joint memorials | 65 | 79 | 100 | 88 | 91 | 82 |
House memorials | 38 | 7 | 28 | 30 | 55 | 25 |
House capital outlay requests | 0 | 0 | 0 | 499 | 858 | 757 |
Senate bills | 1,207 | 863 | 1,300 | 424 | 800 | 501 |
Senate concurrent resolutions | 3 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 |
Senate joint resolutions | 23 | 24 | 16 | 16 | 27 | 23 |
Senate joint memorials | 101 | 103 | 75 | 54 | 67 | 76 |
Senate memorials | 30 | 10 | 14 | 33 | 46 | 39 |
Senate capital outlay requests | 0 | 0 | 0 | 518 | 1,018 | 819 |
2,670 | 1,901 | 2,944 | 2,229 | 3,918 | 2,884 |
NOTE: In years 1997 and earlier, capital outlay proposals were made by bill. Beginning in 1998 and forward, capital outlay proposals were made as "capital outlay requests" rather than bills.
Bill Type |
1995
60 Days |
1996
30 Days |
1997
60 Days |
1998
30 Days |
1999
60 Days |
2000
30 Days |
2,395 | 1,729 | 10,491,049 | ||||
Bills | 2,395 | 1,656 | 2,692 | 968 | 1,729 | 1,041 |
Memorials, resolutions and requests | 275 | 245 | 252 | 1,261 | 2,189 | 1,843 |
2,670 | 1,901 | 2,944 | 2,229 | 3,918 | 2,884 |
As indicated in the tables above, the Legislature tends to propose more bills in 60-day sessions than in 30-day sessions. In 30-day sessions the number of bills introduced that would be under the purview of the proposal generally fall below the limit imposed by the proposal. In 60-day sessions, the bills are more than the limit imposed by the proposal; there may be some savings in 60-day sessions, although it is undeterminable at this time.
ADMINISTRATIVE IMPLICATIONS
There probably would be no significant impact for 30-day sessions, but in 60-day sessions, there may be less bills to draft, refer to committees for hearings, less copying and less analysis performed.
POSSIBLE QUESTIONS
DKB/njw