NOTE: As provided in LFC policy, this report is intended for use by the standing finance committees of the legislature.  The Legislative Finance Committee does not assume responsibility for the accuracy of the information in this report when used in any other situation.



Only the most recent FIR version, excluding attachments, is available on the Intranet. Previously issued FIRs and attachments may be obtained from the LFC office in Suite 101 of the State Capitol Building North.





F I S C A L I M P A C T R E P O R T





SPONSOR: Payne DATE TYPED: 03/01/01 HB
SHORT TITLE: Harassment By Motor Vehicle SB 721/aSJC
ANALYST: Gonzales


APPROPRIATION



Appropriation Contained
Estimated Additional Impact
Recurring

or Non-Rec

Fund

Affected

FY01 FY02 FY01 FY02
See Narrative



(Parenthesis ( ) Indicate Expenditure Decreases)



REVENUE



Estimated Revenue
Subsequent

Years Impact

Recurring

or Non-Rec

Fund

Affected

FY01 FY02
Undeterminable Recurring Current School



(Parenthesis ( ) Indicate Revenue Decreases)



SOURCES OF INFORMATION



Office of the Attorney General (AG)

Administrative Office of the Courts (AOC)

Bernalillo County Metropolitan Court

Administrative Office of the District Attorneys (AODA)

Corrections Department



SUMMARY



Synopsis of SJC Amendment



The Senate Judiciary Committee amendment strikes the provision that would revoke a person's driver's license for one year if guilty of harassment by a motor vehicle keeping only the provision making the offense a misdemeanor.



Synopsis of Original Bill



Senate Bill 721 expands the Harassment and Stalking Act so whoever commits harassment by a motor vehicle is guilty of a misdemeanor and shall have his driver's license revoked for one year.



Significant Issues



The bill states harassment by a motor vehicle consists of "knowingly pursuing a pattern of conduct while operating a motor vehicle that is intended to annoy, seriously alarm or terrorize another person and that serves no lawful purpose." Additionally, the conduct must be such that it would cause a reasonable person to suffer substantial emotional distress.



PERFORMANCE IMPLICATIONS



The impact on the judiciary depends upon how many new prosecutions/cases would result which, if significant, may result in the need for additional resources to avoid a negative impact on the efficiency of the criminal related operations.



FISCAL IMPLICATIONS



Additional fiscal impact on the judiciary as a result of this bill would be proportional to the enforcement of this law, increases caseloads and commenced prosecutions.



Collected fines would create some, presently undeterminable amount of revenue for the "current school fund".



The Corrections Department reports the following fiscal impact to the department:



Since the misdemeanor offense is entirely new, it is difficult for the Department to estimate the number of new convictions that will result from this bill. However, the Department roughly estimates that there will be from approximately fifty (50) to one hundred (100) convictions for the new misdemeanor offense each year. The Department further anticipates that vast majority of the persons convicted of the new misdemeanor offense will be placed under the Department's probationary supervision for one (1) year. The cost per client in Probation and Parole for a standard supervision program is $1,536 per year. The cost per client in Intensive Supervision programs is $3,922 per year. The cost per client in Department-Operated Community Corrections programs is $5,519 per year. The cost per client in Privately-Operated Community Corrections programs is $10,724 per year. The bill will result in a minimal increase in revenue from the probation supervision fees and fines collected from those convicted of the new misdemeanor offense.



ADMINISTRATIVE IMPLICATIONS



See fiscal implications above. Additionally, the Corrections Department reports a moderate increase in the administrative burden upon the department's probation personnel to supervise a larger caseload.



OTHER SUBSTANTIVE ISSUES



The Office of the Attorney General states the following in its bill analysis:



It is confusing whether this bill intends to address a pattern of 'drive by' harassment or the more spontaneous 'road rage.' In either case, the language is problematic because the elements of the offense are very subjective. A 'victim' may see another drive by his home every day at the same hour and time and conclude from "the looks" of a driver or the driver's demeanor that stalking and harassment is occurring. The accused may merely be going to work, enjoying a 'Sunday Drive' or pursuing other legitimate business. If the bill is intended to address sudden outbursts of road rage, again the language does not go far enough to delineate what might legitimately "cause a reasonable person to suffer emotional distress." The accuser will almost always be a private citizen who may have a vendetta or emotional reaction that is out of proportion to the conduct of the accused. In other words, the law calls for entirely subjective determinations without collateral evidence of an injury or delineation of the "pattern of conduct." As such, the fiscal impact to this office probably will not be enormous, but without more clarification, will certainly introduce an entirely new body of defendants to these offices' already crowded rolls.



This bill creates a new misdemeanor-level criminal offense which are punishable by up to 364 days in jail and/or a $1,000 fine.



JMG/njw:ar