NOTE: As provided in LFC policy, this report is intended for use by the standing finance committees of the legislature.  The Legislative Finance Committee does not assume responsibility for the accuracy of the information in this report when used in any other situation.



Only the most recent FIR version, excluding attachments, is available on the Intranet. Previously issued FIRs and attachments may be obtained from the LFC office in Suite 101 of the State Capitol Building North.





F I S C A L I M P A C T R E P O R T





SPONSOR: Maes DATE TYPED: 03/04/01 HB
SHORT TITLE: Mental Health Discrimination SB 688
ANALYST: Dunbar


APPROPRIATION



Appropriation Contained
Estimated Additional Impact
Recurring

or Non-Rec

Fund

Affected

FY01 FY02 FY01 FY02
NFI NFI



(Parenthesis ( ) Indicate Expenditure Decreases)

SOURCES OF INFORMATION



Health Policy Commission (HPC)

State Agency on Aging

Attorney General (AG)

Department of Labor (DOL)



SUMMARY



Synopsis of Bill



SB 688 amends the duties of the Human Rights Commission to include language which permits the Commission to hear complaints, issue orders, and hold hearings in cases alleging mental health discrimination.

Significant Issues



Section 28-1-4 NMSA, 1978 is amended with the addition of language that permits the Human Rights Commission and the Human Rights Division of the Department of Labor to add mental health discrimination to unlawful discriminatory practices.



The amendment allows "due process" for individuals in cases alleging mental health discrimination.



DOL questions the need for the change in legislation by indicating that the NM Human Rights Act already provides that "mental handicap" discrimination is illegal in Section 27-1-7 (A). Mental handicap is a form of mental health that under NMSA 1978 Section 28-1-4 (A) (1), (2) the Commission currently has the right to hold hearings and complaints, and issue orders for persons claiming mental handicap discrimination.



ADMINISTRATIVE IMPLICATIONS



Although DOL indicates that the legislation expands the duties of the New Mexico Human Rights Commission to include holding hearings in cases alleging mental health discrimination, the department does not reveal any administrative concerns.



TECHNICAL ISSUES



The AG provides the following concern with the legislation:



The Human Rights Act provides that the Commission "may" hear complaints and issue orders. The statute is so worded because it allows the Human Rights Division to investigate a complaint, conciliate it, and then make a determination of whether there is probable cause to believe discrimination exists. If the parties successfully conciliate, then there is no hearing. If the Division concludes there is no probable cause, there is no hearing. This is true for all types of discrimination allegations, including discrimination based on "mental handicap" in the areas of employment, union membership, housing, public accommodations and lending.



SB 688 provides that the Commission "shall" hear complaints and issue orders on charges of mental health discrimination. It is unclear how the courts will understand this amendment except that it stands alone as the only mandatory hearing the Commission is to undertake. If this is the way the courts construe SB 688, then conciliation will be less meaningful because it likely will not prevent a hearing. In addition, respondents to allegations of mental health discrimination will have to go to a hearing even if the Division concludes there is no probable cause to believe discrimination exists.

OTHER SUBSTANTIVE ISSUES



HPC specifies that SB 688 adds language that clarifies that individuals can be and often are, discriminated against due to mental health conditions that are beyond the control of the individual, just like cancer, diabetes, and other serious physical health problems.

The following information was made available by the HPC:





BD/ar