NOTE: As provided in LFC policy, this report is intended for use by the standing finance committees of the legislature. The Legislative Finance Committee does not assume responsibility for the accuracy of the information in this report when used in any other situation.
Only the most recent FIR version, excluding attachments, is available on the Intranet. Previously issued FIRs and attachments may be obtained from the LFC office in Suite 101 of the State Capitol Building North.
SPONSOR: | Papen | DATE TYPED: | 03/09/01 | HB | |||
SHORT TITLE: | Rural County Geographic Information Systems | SB | 683 | ||||
ANALYST: | Padilla |
Recurring
or Non-Rec |
Fund
Affected | ||||
FY01 | FY02 | FY01 | FY02 | ||
$ 496.0 | Non-recurring | General Fund |
(Parenthesis ( ) Indicate Expenditure Decreases)
Relates to Senate Bill 56
SOURCES OF INFORMATION
LFC Files
Office of Information Technology Management
Energy, Minerals and Natural Resources Department
No Response Received:
Department of Finance and Administration (DFA)
Taxation and Revenue Department
Regulation and Licensing Department
SUMMARY
Synopsis of Bill
Senate Bill 683 appropriates $496.0 from the general fund to DFA's Local Government Division for the purpose of acquiring geographic information systems (GIS) for counties with less than 250,000 people for the following purposes:
Significant Issues
The only county excluded from the funding in this bill is Bernalillo county. The bill is somewhat ambiguous but appears to apply also to incorporated rural communities with populations less than 10,000.
The acquisition of geographic information systems by counties and rural municipalities could have positive implications for a number of state government agencies. EMNRD, for example, notes that its Forestry Division would benefit from having better rural property ownership data during forest fires so that it could contact threatened owners. The Mining and Minerals Division would benefit from better land use planning information for hard rock and coal mine permitting activities.
FISCAL IMPLICATIONS
The appropriation of $496.0 contained in this bill is a non-recurring expense to the general fund. Any unexpended or unencumbered balance remaining at the end of fiscal year 2002 shall revert to the general fund.
ADMINISTRATIVE IMPLICATIONS
DFA's Local Government Division would be responsible for the distribution of the funds. DFA did not respond to the LFC request for input on this bill.
OTHER SUBSTANTIVE ISSUES
The bill requires the GIS software to be both windows and network compliant and have an open database for seamless integration with existing small government computer and network systems.
CONFLICT/DUPLICATION/COMPANIONSHIP/RELATIONSHIP
This bill relates to Senate Bill 56, which appropriates $105.0 to the Taos Valley Acequia Association and the Rio Chama Acequia Association for the purpose of developing regional acequia geographic information systems.
LP:jsp