NOTE: As provided in LFC policy, this report is intended for use by the standing finance committees of the legislature.  The Legislative Finance Committee does not assume responsibility for the accuracy of the information in this report when used in any other situation.



Only the most recent FIR version, excluding attachments, is available on the Intranet. Previously issued FIRs and attachments may be obtained from the LFC office in Suite 101 of the State Capitol Building North.





F I S C A L I M P A C T R E P O R T





SPONSOR: Maes DATE TYPED: 03/04/01 HB
SHORT TITLE: Change Authority of County Commissioners SB 615
ANALYST: Padilla


APPROPRIATION



Appropriation Contained
Estimated Additional Impact
Recurring

or Non-Rec

Fund

Affected

FY01 FY02 FY01 FY02
NFI NFI



(Parenthesis ( ) Indicate Expenditure Decreases)



SOURCES OF INFORMATION



LFC Files

Public Regulation Commission

New Mexico Association of Counties



SUMMARY



Synopsis of Bill



Senate Bill 615 deletes language that authorizes county commissioners to impose charges for their expenses associated with the granting of public utility and telecommunications franchises.



Significant Issues



Currently, counties are able to recoup reasonable actual expenses that they incur in the granting of electric, gas, water, sewer and telecommunications franchises. These expenses include items such as legal fees, staff costs and court costs. It appears that this bill would remove a county's authority to charge utilities for these expenses. (The PRC, however, reads the bill differently. See their analysis below under "other substantive issues.")



The New Mexico Association of Counties has concerns that this bill may have negative financial implications for their members. The Attorney General notes that these expenses would most in all likelihood be passed along to county taxpayers. The AG's office notes that charging all taxpayers for franchise costs of utilities is not as fair as charging only the ratepayers.



FISCAL IMPLICATIONS



This bill contains no appropriations.



As noted above, the bill may require counties to incur costs that are now passed along to utilities and then to ratepayers.



OTHER SUBSTANTIVE ISSUES



The PRC adds:



Section 18 of the Electric Restructuring Act requires that a franchise fee charge be stated on a separate line item on a regulated electric utility's bills, to be recovered only from customers located within the jurisdiction of the government authority imposing the franchise fee. For other utilities, franchise fees can be included within the cost of service for the utility or broken out as a separate line item for collection from the end customer. Telecommunications companies also separate franchise fees on their billings.



It appears that statute as currently written limits a county's franchise fee to reasonable actual expenses incurred. The amendment contained in this bill may remove the actual expense limit currently allowed to be collected through a county's franchise fees negotiated with utilities. An unreasonable franchise fee charged by a county to a provider of public telecommunications service may be deemed a barrier to entry in violation of Section 253 of the Federal Telecommunications Act.

LP/ar