NOTE: As provided in LFC policy, this report is intended for use by the standing finance committees of the legislature.  The Legislative Finance Committee does not assume responsibility for the accuracy of the information in this report when used in any other situation.



Only the most recent FIR version, excluding attachments, is available on the Intranet. Previously issued FIRs and attachments may be obtained from the LFC office in Suite 101 of the State Capitol Building North.





F I S C A L I M P A C T R E P O R T





SPONSOR: Rawson DATE TYPED: 02/22/01 HB
SHORT TITLE: Consolidation of Dona Ana County Courts SB 465
ANALYST: Hayes


APPROPRIATION



Appropriation Contained
Estimated Additional Impact
Recurring

or Non-Rec

Fund

Affected

FY01 FY02 FY01 FY02
$ 60.0 Non-recurring General Fund



(Parenthesis ( ) Indicate Expenditure Decreases)



Relates to SB130, SB194, HB443



SOURCES OF INFORMATION



Administrative Office of the Courts

LFC files



SUMMARY



Synopsis of Bill



SB465 appropriates $60.0 from the general fund to the Administrative Office of the Courts for the purpose of establishing a consolidation study committee, with the approval of the Supreme Court, in order to consider combining the Doña Ana County magistrate and municipal courts. The bill appropriates the $60.0 to the AOC to carry out the requirements of the bill and to reimburse committee members for mileage and per diem.



The committee shall report its findings and recommendation to the city council, the board of county commissioners and the Legislature by December 1, 2001.



Significant Issues



At its current judge and staffing level, the Doña Ana Magistrate Court is falling behind at a rate of over 10,000 cases per year. The AOC Magistrate Court Division regularly receives complaints from citizens and attorneys in Doña Ana County about that court. Numerous efforts (including traveling judges and clerks from all over the state, grants, volunteers, AOC staff analyses, intervention by the Chief Justice, various reorganizations and action plans) have not remedied those problems. Problems with the operations of the Las Cruces Municipal Court have also surfaced in the press.



The 17-member consolidation committee proposed by this bill will consider the possibility of combining the magistrate and municipal courts in Dona Ana county. The members are from different governmental agencies, areas and courts, but all with an interest in this proposal. By comprising the committee with such a diverse group, the committee will ensure input from all effected parties.



The Magistrate Court Director supports the committee study, but suggests that the municipal courts may be somewhat under-represented on the committee since four municipal courts currently exist in the county and only one municipal judge from Las Cruces has been identified as a member of the consolidation committee.



The committee itself will elect a chairperson and meet at least once per month until presentation of its findings.



FISCAL IMPLICATIONS



The appropriation of $60.0 contained in this bill is a non-recurring expense to the general fund. Any unexpended or unencumbered balance remaining at the end of 2002 shall revert to the general fund.



RELATIONSHIP



SB130, SB194 and HB443 request increases in judges and clerks as a result of Dona Ana's case volume and backlog.



TECHNICAL ISSUES



Suggest changing "chairman" in Section 1B on page 3 to "chairperson."



EFFECTIVE DATE needs to be indicated.



OTHER SUBSTANTIVE ISSUES



A somewhat similar study was conducted in 1995 pursuant to a Senate Joint Memorial in order to determine whether the Dona Ana magistrate courts should become a metropolitan court. At that time, however, the court did not have the population base to qualify as a "metropolitan" court.



CMH/lrs