NOTE: As provided in LFC policy, this report is intended for use by the standing finance committees of the legislature.  The Legislative Finance Committee does not assume responsibility for the accuracy of the information in this report when used in any other situation.



Only the most recent FIR version, excluding attachments, is available on the Intranet. Previously issued FIRs and attachments may be obtained from the LFC office in Suite 101 of the State Capitol Building North.





F I S C A L I M P A C T R E P O R T





SPONSOR: Sanchez DATE TYPED: 03/06/01 HB
SHORT TITLE: Marital Status as a Protected Category SB 369/aSPAC/aSJC
ANALYST: Taylor


APPROPRIATION



Appropriation Contained
Estimated Additional Impact
Recurring

or Non-Rec

Fund

Affected

FY01 FY02 FY01 FY02
NFI



(Parenthesis ( ) Indicate Revenue Decreases)



SOURCES OF INFORMATION



State Personnel Office (SPO)

Labor Department



SUMMARY



Synopsis of SJC Amendments



The Senate Judiciary Committee amended Senate Bill 369 amending language regarding what is unlawful discrimination. Current law says it is unlawful discrimination for an employer to discriminate against certain classes of persons because of race, age, religion, color, national origin, ancestry, sex, physical or mental handicap or serious medical condition unless based on a bona fide occupational qualification. The amendment changes that last proviso so that it would now say "unless based on a bona fide occupational qualification or other statutory provision.



Synopsis of Senate Public Affairs Committee Amendments



The Senate Public Affairs Committee amended Senate Bill 369 by striking throughout the word marital status and replacing it with spousal affiliation.



Synopsis of Original Bill



Senate Bill 369 amends the Human Rights Act by adding marital status as a protected category. Thus, the bill would make it illegal for employers, labor organizations, and employment agencies to discriminate in the areas of hiring, firing, promotion, membership, apprenticeships and other job training based on marital status. It would also be illegal to discriminate in the area of public accommodations including the housing market and financial assistance area.



The bill also adds "serious medical condition" to the area that prohibits employment agencies from refusing to list and properly classify for employment or refer an individual from a known available job for which the person qualifies.



FISCAL IMPLICATIONS



The New Mexico Labor Department bill analysis notes that the federal equal Employment Opportunity Commission does not accept discrimination based upon marital status. Thus, all complaints would have to be handled by the New Mexico Labor Department. However, the department says that it expects that it would be able to absorb the work with existing staff. Hence, there is no immediate fiscal impact.



If workload were to increase considerably, the department may eventually require additional staff.



OTHER SUBSTANTIVE ISSUES



The Labor Department notes that the bill does not provide an exemption to prohibition for religious organizations. They say that religious organizations may be forced to hire or house persons whose marital status conflicts with their doctrine.



The State Personnel Office writes that the bill may be in conflict with provisions of the Nepotism Act that prohibits certain employment relations between spouses. They also say that exceptions need to be made for personnel officers after hire because marital status information is necessary for insurance and retirement administration.



BT/njw:ar