NOTE: As provided in LFC policy, this report is intended for use by the standing finance committees of the legislature. The Legislative Finance Committee does not assume responsibility for the accuracy of the information in this report when used in any other situation.
Only the most recent FIR version, excluding attachments, is available on the Intranet. Previously issued FIRs and attachments may be obtained from the LFC office in Suite 101 of the State Capitol Building North.
SPONSOR: | Sanchez, M | DATE TYPED: | 2/20/01 | HB | |||
SHORT TITLE: | Clarify Use of Limited Driver's License | SB | 251 | ||||
ANALYST: | Rael |
Recurring
or Non-Rec |
Fund
Affected | ||||
FY01 | FY02 | FY01 | FY02 | ||
No Fiscal Impact |
(Parenthesis ( ) Indicate Expenditure Decreases)
SOURCES OF INFORMATION
Administrative Office of the Courts (AOC)
State Highway and Transportation Department (SHTD)
Taxation and Revenue Department (TRD)
Department of Public Safety (DPS)
23 U.S.C. §§ 408, 410
SUMMARY
Synopsis of Bill
The Clarify Use a Limited Driver's License bill amends Section 66-5-35 by allowing a person whose driver's license was suspended or revoked to apply to the Motor Vehicles Department for a limited use license to attend a court-ordered treatment program. This person must show proof that he is enrolled in a court-ordered treatment program and needs a limited license to travel to and from the treatment program.
Significant Issues
Federal law encourages states to adopt laws that would mandate a driver's license relocation for not less than one year for repeat offenders.
FISCAL IMPLICATIONS
This bill has no fiscal impact.
The State Highway and Transportation Department correctly notes that federal law encourages states to pass laws that mandate a one year driver's license revocation for repeat offenders. In the 1980s, the federal government required that states pass these laws in order to be eligible for certain federal highway grants. While the federal law encouraging states to pass repeat DWI offender laws currently does not offer grants as incentives, it is possible that it will do so again in the future.
TECHNICAL ISSUES
In order to comply with federal recommendations, the SHTD recommends the following amendments:
OTHER SUBSTANTIVE ISSUES
The Public Defender reports that rehabilitation may prevent recidivism. Without the clarifying language of this statute, the offender who has been ordered to attend a treatment program may not be able to accomplish this essential step toward rehabilitation if he can not drive on a suspended license. In a vast majority of the cases, not having vehicular transportation will simply prevent the offender from complying with the courts' orders. Untreated substance abuse offenders will only remain a peril to society and continue to tax the public coffers with repeat offenses.
FAR/njw