NOTE: As provided in LFC policy, this report is intended for use by the standing finance committees of the legislature.  The Legislative Finance Committee does not assume responsibility for the accuracy of the information in this report when used in any other situation.



Only the most recent FIR version, excluding attachments, is available on the Intranet. Previously issued FIRs and attachments may be obtained from the LFC office in Suite 101 of the State Capitol Building North.





F I S C A L I M P A C T R E P O R T





SPONSOR: Kidd DATE TYPED: 02/02/01 HB
SHORT TITLE: Clarify Security For Public Deposits SB 123
ANALYST: Eaton


REVENUE



Estimated Revenue
Subsequent

Years Impact

Recurring

or Non-Rec

Fund

Affected

FY01 FY02
NFI



(Parenthesis ( ) Indicate Revenue Decreases)



Duplicates House Bill 254 - Irwin



SOURCES OF INFORMATION



Financial Institutions Division, Regulation and Licensing Department (RLD)



SUMMARY



Synopsis of Bill



House Bill 254 amends and clarifies the requirement for security of deposits of public money, by allowing the security for public funds to include surety bonds.



Significant Issues



In lieu of using the securities defined in Section 6-10-16 NMSA 1978 as security for public deposits, surety bonds may be utilized as security for those deposits. Types of securities presently allowed for public deposits are:



Pledged securities are not needed for any deposits covered by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation.



PERFORMANCE IMPLICATIONS



No impact on agency performance.



FISCAL IMPLICATIONS



No fiscal impact.



ADMINISTRATIVE IMPLICATIONS



The Financial Institutions Division reviews securities for public funds during each bank, credit union and savings and loan examination. This bill would not affect the financial institution review process.



OTHER SUBSTANTIVE ISSUES



Because this bill has an emergency clause, it would take effect immediately upon signature by the Governor.



POSSIBLE QUESTIONS



Is allowing surety bonds to be used as security involve more risk to any of the parties involved?





JBE/njw