NOTE: As provided in LFC policy, this report is intended for use by the standing finance committees of the legislature. The Legislative Finance Committee does not assume responsibility for the accuracy of the information in this report when used in any other situation.
Only the most recent FIR version, excluding attachments, is available on the Intranet. Previously issued FIRs and attachments may be obtained from the LFC office in Suite 101 of the State Capitol Building North.
| SPONSOR: | Cisneros | DATE TYPED: | 01/26/01 | HB | |||
| SHORT TITLE: | Taos Valley Errors & Omissions Process | SB | 57 | ||||
| ANALYST: | Dotson | ||||||
| Recurring
or Non-Rec |
Fund
Affected | ||||
| FY01 | FY02 | FY01 | FY02 | ||
| $ 60.0 | Non-Recurring | General | |||
(Parenthesis ( ) Indicate Expenditure Decreases)
Relates to HB 56 and 157
SOURCES OF INFORMATION
Office of the State Engineer
SUMMARY
Synopsis of Bill
SB 57 appropriates $60,000 from the general fund to the local goverment division of the Department of Finance and Administration for the purpose of identifying errors and omissions in the Rio Pueblo de Taos water adjudication lawsuit.
Significant Issues
According to the State Engineer, the level of funding for the participation of acequias in ongoing water adjudication suits in Northern New Mexico may be excess of present needs. The 2000 legislature appropriated $650,000 for the Acequia and Community Ditch Fund (ACDF). During the distribution of these funds to applicant acequias, it was reported by the staff of the New Mexico Department of Agriculture (the body who administers the fund) that 8 applicant acequias had a total balance of approximately $380,000 from previous appropriations remaining in their accounts. Much of these funds were not encumbered by the acequias who in some cases had no specific plans for their use. Actual litigation activity in ongoing water adjudication suits in Northern New Mexico is very uneven. While there is much work to be done, budgetary and manpower constraints within the Office of State Engineer limit the ability of the agency to advance these suits.
FISCAL IMPLICATIONS
The appropriation of $60.0 contained in this bill is a non-recurring expense to the general fund. Any unexpended or unencumbered balance remaining at the end of FY02 shall revert to the general fund.
PD/ar