NOTE: As provided in LFC policy, this report is intended for use by the standing finance committees of the legislature. The Legislative Finance Committee does not assume responsibility for the accuracy of the information in this report when used in any other situation.
Only the most recent FIR version, excluding attachments, is available on the Intranet. Previously issued FIRs and attachments may be obtained from the LFC office in Suite 101 of the State Capitol Building North.
SPONSOR: | Lujan | DATE TYPED: | 02/13/01 | HB | 658 | ||
SHORT TITLE: | Rural Telecommunications Carriers | SB | |||||
ANALYST: | Valenzuela |
Recurring
or Non-Rec |
Fund
Affected | ||||
FY01 | FY02 | FY01 | FY02 | ||
NFI |
(Parenthesis ( ) Indicate Expenditure Decreases)
SOURCES OF INFORMATION
LFC Files
SUMMARY
Synopsis of Bill
House Bill 358 amends the New Mexico Telecommunications Act to exempt incumbent rural telecommunications carriers, as defined in the Rural Telecommunications Act of New Mexico [Section 63-9H-3], from the statutory mandates, i.e., rules adopted by the Public Regulation Commission (PRC), of subsection (B) of 63-9A-8.2. This subsection outlines the statutory constructs of PRC rules as
The Rural Telecommunications Act of New Mexico defines "incumbent rural telecommunications carriers" accordingly:
A local exchange carrier that serves fewer than fifty thousand access lines within the state and was designated as an eligible telecommunications carrier by the state corporation commission on or before November 1, 1997, including any successor in interest thereto.
Significant Issues
This statute seems to apply only to incumbent local exchange carriers (ILECs) with more than 50,000 access lines. Consequently, it seems, on its face, the effect of the bill is to make explicitly clear that rural telecommunications carriers are not required comply with PRC rules promulgated pursuant to this statute.
However, the PRC recently promulgated rules that it conveyed should be applicable to rural telecommunications carriers as well as ILECs. A statement from the PRC is provided below:
FISCAL IMPLICATIONS
House Bill 658 does not carry an appropriation. Enactment of the bill would have a fiscal impact on the PRC because it would have to revise its rules. However, the PRC is adequately funded to handle this workload within its operating budget.
MFV/ar