NOTE: As provided in LFC policy, this report is intended for use by the standing finance committees of the legislature. The Legislative Finance Committee does not assume responsibility for the accuracy of the information in this report when used in any other situation.
Only the most recent FIR version, excluding attachments, is available on the Intranet. Previously issued FIRs and attachments may be obtained from the LFC office in Suite 101 of the State Capitol Building North.
SPONSOR: | Bratton | DATE TYPED: | 02/21/01 | HB | 654 | ||
SHORT TITLE: | Right to Work Act | SB | |||||
ANALYST: |
Dunbar |
Recurring
or Non-Rec |
Fund
Affected | ||||
FY01 | FY02 | FY01 | FY02 | ||
See Narrative |
(Parenthesis ( ) Indicate Expenditure Decreases)
Conflicts with SB 75, HB 721
Relates to SM 2, HB 861, SB 787
SOURCES OF INFORMATION
Personnel Board
Labor Department
SUMMARY
Synopsis of Bill
This bill makes unlawful the requirement that employees join or pay dues to a labor organization as a condition of employment. The bill also requires that voluntary dues deduction be subject to termination by the employee at any time.
Significant Issues
In summary, HB 654:
A violation of the act is considered a misdemeanor subject to a one thousand dollar fine or 90 days in jail. Right to Work provisions do not apply to existing contracts but will apply to renewals and extensions, and to new contracts after the effective date of this act
CONFLICT
Conflicts with SB 75, HB 721
Relates to SM2; HB 861; SB 787
OTHER SUBSTANTIVE ISSUES
DOL points out that the major impact of this bill would be upon private employers within union labor.
There is no current collective bargaining agreement covering state employees. However, municipalities, school districts and county government would be affected by this legislation.
BT/ar