NOTE: As provided in LFC policy, this report is intended for use by the standing finance committees of the legislature. The Legislative Finance Committee does not assume responsibility for the accuracy of the information in this report when used in any other situation.
Only the most recent FIR version, excluding attachments, is available on the Intranet. Previously issued FIRs and attachments may be obtained from the LFC office in Suite 101 of the State Capitol Building North.
SPONSOR: | Park | DATE TYPED: | 02/23/01 | HB | 638 | ||
SHORT TITLE: | Amend Patient Protection Act | SB | |||||
ANALYST: | Wilson |
Recurring
or Non-Rec |
Fund
Affected | ||||
FY01 | FY02 | FY01 | FY02 | ||
See Narrative |
(Parenthesis ( ) Indicate Expenditure Decreases)
SOURCES OF INFORMATION
Public Regulation Commission (PRC)
Retiree Health Care Authority (RHCA)
Attorney General's Office (AG)
Health Policy Commission (HPC)
SUMMARY
Synopsis of Bill
HB 638 weakens the Patient Protection Act by limiting private civil claims for relief to proven actual damages rather than guaranteeing at least a minimum recovery of $100 for violations as currently provided.
Significant Issues
The AG states that HB 638 leaves consumers with no economically viable civil remedy for small dollar violations of the Patient Protection Act.
FISCAL IMPLICATIONS
There is no agreement about whether HB 638 will cause claim damage awards to go up or down. If they rise there could be a slight rise in premiums and the State as the employer of the public school employees, the state employees and retirees would be affected.
OTHER SUBSTANTIVE ISSUES
The HPC provided the following:
DW/ar