NOTE: As provided in LFC policy, this report is intended for use by the standing finance committees of the legislature. The Legislative Finance Committee does not assume responsibility for the accuracy of the information in this report when used in any other situation.
Only the most recent FIR version, excluding attachments, is available on the Intranet. Previously issued FIRs and attachments may be obtained from the LFC office in Suite 101 of the State Capitol Building North.
SPONSOR: | HFL | DATE TYPED: | 03/08/01 | HB | 592/HFLS | ||
SHORT TITLE: | Expand Medicaid for Certain Custodial Parents | SB | |||||
ANALYST: | Taylor |
Recurring
or Non-Rec |
Fund
Affected | ||||
FY01 | FY02 | FY01 | FY02 | ||
$ 5,322.6 | Recurring | Tobacco
Settlement | |||
$ 22,691.1 | Recurring | Federal |
(Parenthesis ( ) Indicate Expenditure Decreases)
Duplicates SB418
SOURCES OF INFORMATION
Human Services Department (HSD)
Health Policy Commission (HPC)
Taxation and Revenue Department (TRD)
SUMMARY
Synopsis of House Floor Substitute for HB 592
The House Floor Substitute for House Bill 592 appropriates $5,322.6 from the Tobacco Settlement Program Fund for the purpose of matching state children's health insurance program funds to expand Medicaid coverage to custodial parents whose income is below one-hundred percent of the federal poverty level.
The bill would make the low-income parents eligibility subject to the availability of state and federal matching funds. HSD is provided the authority, after consulting with the Legislature (or the Legislative Finance Committee and the Legislative Health and Human Services Committee when the Legislature is not in session), to establish different income requirements (by changing the income disregards) if the cost of the expanded program creates budgetary limitations.
Substantive Issues
The substitute bill defines custodial parents to mean a natural parent, adoptive parent, stepparent or legal guardian with whom the child lives.
It also requires HSD to determine the parents net countable income by excluding income from exempted sources and disregards that are allowed in the New Mexico Works Act.
FISCAL IMPLICATIONS
The appropriation of $5,322.6 contained in this bill is a recurring expense to the Tobacco Settlement Program Fund. Any unexpended or unencumbered balance remaining at the end of FY 2002 shall revert to the Tobacco Settlement Program Fund. The $5,322.6 million in state funds would leverage $22,691 in federal funds (the federal government match for the SCHIP program is 81 percent).
The appropriation contained in HB592 should be sufficient to pay for the first year of the program, but the cost will grow in future years. The Human Services Department (HSD) estimates that about 57,000 persons will be eligible for the program. However, in a meeting with legislative staff, HSD staff indicated it is unlikely they could start the program before the last quarter of FY 2002. This is because this legislation will require a waiver from the federal Health Care Financing Administration (HCFA). While HCFA has sent a letter to Medicaid directors across the country indicating a willingness to support this kind of a waiver request, the department, based on prior experiences with HCFA, expects that getting the waiver approved will take at least six months. They say that it will take the department an additional three months to promulgate rules for the program.
HSD estimates that the full cost to the state-if every person eligible for the program enrolled--would be about $33.6 million. (This implies an average per member per month cost of $189). Thus, the full cost for one quarter would be $8.4 million, again assuming everyone eligible for the program enrolled at the start of the quarter. Realistically, not all persons eligible for the program will enroll. National Economic Research Associates, a consulting firm hired by the Health Policy Commission to develop a strategic plan to address problems of the uninsured, reported that based on the experiences of other states, the state might optimistically expect 65 percent of program eligibles to actually enroll. They also suggested that this would not happen overnight, as it would take the department time to inform the eligible population and enroll them. The HB592 appropriation of $5.3 million would be sufficient to enroll 63 percent of eligibles in the last quarter of the fiscal year. 63 percent enrollment in a three-month period would be quite an achievement for the department. 63 percent full time enrollment actually implies a considerably higher enrollment at the end of the year, given that enrollment will happen gradually over the three-month period. (Note: the department has some influence over the timing. In its efforts to enroll more children in the SCHIP program, it rolled out its outreach efforts over a number of months to not overwhelm its income support workers.)
The likely full costs of the program, once it is completely implemented is approximately $22 million. This represents 65 percent of the cost for all eligibles, and will likely be realized over a three-year period.
The General Appropriations Act, HB2/aSFC, includes $2.5 million to provide Medicaid coverage for temporary assistance for needy families (TANF) clients that have not been eligible because of income guidelines. Thus, total state resources available to cover the defined low-income population is $7.8 million.
ADMINISTRATIVE IMPLICATIONS
The department reports that it will need additional ISD staffing to handle the increased workload. However, given the department's estimate that the program will be slow in getting off the ground in FY02 and that they should be able to roll out the program in stages, the administrative impact in the first year should be small. Based on LFC staff discussions with ISD, it appears that the division will be looking at staffing issues during the interim to get a better handle on how different kinds of cases (food stamps, TANF and medicaid) impact their need for workers.
OTHER SUBSTANTIVE ISSUES
BT/njw:ar