NOTE: As provided in LFC policy, this report is intended for use by the standing finance committees of the legislature. The Legislative Finance Committee does not assume responsibility for the accuracy of the information in this report when used in any other situation.
Only the most recent FIR version, excluding attachments, is available on the Intranet. Previously issued FIRs and attachments may be obtained from the LFC office in Suite 101 of the State Capitol Building North.
SPONSOR: | Martinez | DATE TYPED: | 03/13/01 | HB | 460/aSJC | ||
SHORT TITLE: | Battery Against a Household Member Penalties | SB | |||||
ANALYST: | Rael |
Recurring
or Non-Rec |
Fund
Affected | ||||
FY01 | FY02 | FY01 | FY02 | ||
See Narrative |
Recurring | General Fund |
(Parenthesis ( ) Indicate Expenditure Decreases)
SOURCES OF INFORMATION
Administrative Office of the Courts (AOC)
Corrections Department (CD)
Administrative Office of the District Attorneys (AODA)
Public Defender Department (PDD)
SUMMARY
Synopsis of SJC Amendment
The Senate Judiciary Committee Amendment would allow battery that causes painful temporary disfigurement or temporary loss or impairment of bodily functions to continue to be characterized as aggravated battery.
Synopsis of Original Bill
The Battery Against a Household Member Penalties bill amends Section 30-3-15 to provide that battery against a household member is a misdemeanor instead of a petty misdemeanor. Battery causing a painful temporary disfigurement or temporary loss or impairment of the functions of any member or organ would no longer be characterized as an aggravated battery, but it would continue to carry the same penalty of a misdemeanor offense.
Significant Issues
The debate appears to be whether quick penalties or harsh penalties have a greater deterrence effect on the domestic violence problem.
FISCAL IMPLICATIONS
The Corrections Department reports that since there is a large number of battery against a household member offenses each year, the cost increase will be significant.
The cost per client in Probation and Parole for a standard supervision program is $1,536 per year. The cost per client in Intensive Supervision programs is $3,922 per year. The cost per client in Department-Operated Community Corrections programs is $5,519 per year. The cost per client in Privately-Operated Community Corrections programs is $10,724 per year. However, there will be a minimal increase in revenue due to additional probation supervision fees being collected.
It will cost the judicial information system $400 for statewide update, distribution and documentation of statutory changes. Any additional fiscal impact on the judiciary would be proportional to the enforcement of this law and commenced prosecutions. New laws, amendments to existing laws, and new hearings have the potential to increase caseloads in the courts, thus requiring additional resources to handle the increase.
OTHER SUBSTANTIVE ISSUES
The Administrative Office of the District Attorney suggests that aggravated battery against a household member with no great bodily harm (but with injury), as currently defined in Section 30-3-16(B), should be a fourth degree felony. A petty misdemeanor crime for domestic violence may have only nominal deterrence effects. Increasing the penalty for domestic violence offenses allows more time to treat offenders and victims during probation periods. Treatment can be very successful in such cases, but the period of probation must be long enough to allow success.
However, the Public Defender Department would object. The Public Defender believes that in domestic violence situations, immediate consequences are necessary. Jail immediately is preferable to jail months later. Jail at every instance of violence rather than jail on the fourth police call is preferable. The speed with which the system operates is critical. The Public Defender believes that increasing penalties, particularly when crimes are shifted from misdemeanor courts to felony courts, actually slows down the legal system.
FAR/lrs:ar:njw