NOTE: As provided in LFC policy, this report is intended for use by the standing finance committees of the legislature.  The Legislative Finance Committee does not assume responsibility for the accuracy of the information in this report when used in any other situation.



Only the most recent FIR version, excluding attachments, is available on the Intranet. Previously issued FIRs and attachments may be obtained from the LFC office in Suite 101 of the State Capitol Building North.



F I S C A L I M P A C T R E P O R T



SPONSOR: Nunez DATE TYPED: 03/12/01 HB 454/aHFl #1
SHORT TITLE: State Trust Lands Improvements SB
ANALYST: Belmares


APPROPRIATION



Appropriation Contained
Estimated Additional Impact
Recurring

or Non-Rec

Fund

Affected

FY01 FY02 FY01 FY02
$ 1,220.0 Recurring Land Office Maintenance Fund



(Parenthesis ( ) Indicate Expenditure Decreases)



REVENUE



Estimated Revenue
Subsequent

Years Impact

Recurring

or Non-Rec

Fund

Affected

FY01 FY02
$ (1,220.0) $ (1,220.0) Recurring General Fund
See Narrative



(Parenthesis ( ) Indicate Revenue Decreases)



Duplicates Senate Bill 326



SOURCES OF INFORMATION



LFC Files

Department of Environment (DOE)

State Land Office



SUMMARY



Synopsis of House Floor Amendment to Bill



House Floor Amendment #1 to House Bill 454 makes minor modifications to the original bill. The amendment adds the adjective "invasive" before the phrase "noxious weeds." The State Land Office has indicated the addition of the adjective "invasive" refers to other than native species. The amendment replaces the phrase "makes improvements" with "restoration of and remediation" (of State Trust Land). The amendment tracks the text of the bill to the Senate version of the bill.



Synopsis of Original Bill



House Bill 454 appropriates $1.22 million to the State Land Office from the Land Maintenance Fund to support watershed restoration, remediate contaminated sites, clean-up unauthorized landfills, stabilize archeological sites, survey cultural resources and manage noxious weeds on state trust land.



Significant Issues



The State Land Office has identified several projects the following projects that would be completed utilizing the $1.22 million appropriation:

FISCAL IMPLICATIONS



House Bill 454 appropriates $1,220.0 to the State Land Office from the Land Office Maintenance Fund which receives revenues from oil and gas rental and bonuses, grazing rentals, miscellaneous rentals, interest on cash deposits and other income (from renewable resources).



Funds from the Land Office Maintenance Fund are used to support the administrative costs of the State Land Office with the balance being distributed to beneficiaries. Although the State Land Office receives its revenue from the Land Office Maintenance Fund and not general fund, the Legislative Finance Committee considers the State Land Office a general fund agency because changes in agency expenditures directly affect general fund revenue. The $1.22 million appropriation contained within House Bill 454 would have a direct impact on the general fund and would decrease distributions to beneficiaries.



ADMINISTRATIVE IMPLICATIONS



The State Land Office has indicated it has the capacity to implement the project utilizing existing personnel and operational resources. The State Land Office has experience managing similar projects and should be able to implement the project with minimal administrative impacts.



The Department of Environment has indicated the State Land Office would possibly rely on several bureaus within the Department of Environment to assist the State Land Office in implementing the project. The Department of Environment has indicated the administrative impact would be minimal.



POSSIBLE QUESTIONS



How would the appropriation be distributed? Since each tract of land generates its own revenue, would the appropriation be applied to state trust lands in a corresponding fashion?



EB/njw:ar