NOTE: As provided in LFC policy, this report is intended for use by the standing finance committees of the legislature. The Legislative Finance Committee does not assume responsibility for the accuracy of the information in this report when used in any other situation.
Only the most recent FIR version, excluding attachments, is available on the Intranet. Previously issued FIRs and attachments may be obtained from the LFC office in Suite 101 of the State Capitol Building North.
SPONSOR: | Rios | DATE TYPED: | 2/18/01 | HB | 450 | ||
SHORT TITLE: | Enforce Disabled Parking on Private Property | SB | |||||
ANALYST: | Rael |
Subsequent
Years Impact |
Recurring
or Non-Rec |
Fund
Affected | ||
FY01 | FY02 | |||
No Fiscal Impact |
(Parenthesis ( ) Indicate Revenue Decreases)
SOURCES OF INFORMATION
Taxation and Revenue Department (TRD)
Department of Public Safety (DPS)
Administrative Office of the Courts (AOC)
SUMMARY
Synopsis of Bill
The Enforce Disabled Parking on Private Property bill updates certain statute references and adds a new section, Section 66-7-352.6 pertaining to the enforcement of violations under Section 66-7-352.5, allowing state, county and municipal law enforcement personnel to have the authority to issue citations for the unauthorized use of parking spaces for the disabled in their respective jurisdictions, whether the violation occurs on public or private property.
FISCAL IMPLICATIONS
No fiscal impact.
TECHNICAL ISSUES
OTHER SUBSTANTIVE ISSUES
This bill should have a minimal impact on DPS. The definition of highway in Section 66-1-4.8, currently means every way or place generally open to the use of the public as a matter of right for the purpose of vehicular travel. This proposed legislation would only add violations in areas that are restricted to general public use at the current time.
The AOC reports that this proposed legislation is likely the result of a Rio Rancho case where a municipal law enforcement officer issued a parking ticket to a person for parking in a parking space reserved for the disabled located on private property. The case was appealed to the district court and overturned because there was no jurisdiction on private property.
FAR/njw