NOTE: As provided in LFC policy, this report is intended for use by the standing finance committees of the legislature. The Legislative Finance Committee does not assume responsibility for the accuracy of the information in this report when used in any other situation.
Only the most recent FIR version, excluding attachments, is available on the Intranet. Previously issued FIRs and attachments may be obtained from the LFC office in Suite 101 of the State Capitol Building North.
SPONSOR: | Larranaga | DATE TYPED: | 03/05/01 | HB | 341/aHTC | ||
SHORT TITLE: | Intercept Gas Tax Revenue to Certain Cities | SB | |||||
ANALYST: | Williams |
Subsequent
Years Impact |
Recurring
or Non-Rec |
Fund
Affected | ||
FY01 | FY02 | |||
$ (20.0) | $ (180.0) | Non-Recurring | City of Belen | |
$ 20.0 | $ 180.0 | Non-Recurring | State Highway and Transportation Dept. |
(Parenthesis ( ) Indicate Revenue Decreases)
SOURCES OF INFORMATION
LFC Files
Taxation and Revenue Department (TRD)
State Highway and Transportation Department (SHTD)
Department of Finance and Administration (DFA)
SUMMARY
Synopsis of HTC Amendments
The House Transportation Committee amendments remove the condition that the intercept occurs if the municipalities violate an agreement with SHTD.
Synopsis of Original Bill
The bill changes the gasoline tax distribution for a qualifying municipality. This change would be occur for a municipality:
1) with a population of greater than 605 thousand and located in a class B county with a population between 45 and 48 thousand as shown in the 1990 Census and
2) that violated an agreement with the SHTD.
Two portions of gasoline tax revenue would be redirected to the SHTD until that Department certifies that $200.0 has been diverted or until the municipality is in compliance with all agreements between the municipality and the SHTD.
The bill also allows the municipality to meet previous bond payments or pledges, which will be deducted from the $200.0 distribution. The bill does not contain an effective date.
Significant Issues
Effectively, the qualifying municipality is the city of Belen.
FISCAL IMPLICATIONS
The bill would reduce revenues of the City of Belen by $20.0 in FY01 and $180.0 in FY02, and the SHTD would receive these revenues.
ADMINISTRATIVE IMPLICATIONS
TRD expresses concerns regarding administering on-going monthly tax intercepts based on disputes between jurisdictions and state agencies.
AW/ar