NOTE: As provided in LFC policy, this report is intended for use by the standing finance committees of the legislature.  The Legislative Finance Committee does not assume responsibility for the accuracy of the information in this report when used in any other situation.

Only the most recent FIR version, excluding attachments, is available on the Intranet. Previously issued FIRs and attachments may be obtained from the LFC office in Suite 101 of the State Capitol Building North.

(Parenthesis ( ) Indicate Revenue Decreases)

Duplicates/Conflicts with/Companion to/Relates to HB 219

SOURCES OF INFORMATION

Taxation and Revenue Department and the Energy, Mineral and Natural Resources Department.

SUMMARY

Synopsis of Bill

Establishes two intergovernmental tax credits that decreases total revenue an estimated $8.55 million in FY02 and $10.9 million is subsequent years.

According to the Taxation and Revenue Department Secretary, this bill proposes that the state and the Navajo Nation share the proceeds of taxes imposed on the production (severance) of coal extracted from Navajo Nation lands. The state imposes five taxes on coal severance and sale: property tax, resources excise tax, severance tax, gross receipts tax and conservation tax. The Navajo Nation imposes two taxes: possessory interest tax (PIT) and business activities tax (BAT). This bill proposes that the Navajo Nation recede from their two taxes by providing a 25% credit against taxes otherwise due. The state would reciprocally provide a credit of 75% of the lower of the state tax or Navajo Nation tax. Thus, BAT is matched with gross receipts tax and PIT is matched with severance tax, with the state and county governments receiving about ¼ of the previous level of tax and the Navajo Nation receiving about ¾ of the previous level of state tax. The state's resources excise, property and conservation taxes are largely unaffected by this proposal. Taxes on production from two mines are affected by this proposal: Navajo mine in San Juan County which feeds Four Corner's power plant; and McKinley Mine in McKinley County which feeds San Juan Generating Station. Because of the specifics of the lease and tax waiver provisions between the companies and the Nation, this proposal affects the two companies quite a bit differently. Both coal producers have contracts with the power plants. These contracts apparently have pass-through features, such that the netback to the producer is maintained in the face of changes in royalty and taxes. Thus, the economic benefits of this bill are passed to the power plants. The benefits under this bill almost offset the additional tax cost of the expiration of the Navajo Nation tax waivers.

Significant Issues

The coal companies located on the Navajo Nation have been operating under a Navajo Nation tax waiver for thirty years. The wavier expires on July 1, 2001. With the expiration of the wavier the coal companies are exposed to the full taxing authorities of the Navajo Nation and the State of New Mexico. This bill is an attempt to address the concerns expressed by the coal companies and power plants that the level of taxation after July 1,2001 is unreasonable.

OTHER SUBSTANTIVE ISSUES

A 20% total tax burden would exist, which is very high in the industry, if the intergovernmental tax credits are not adopted. Future expansion of coal fired generating power plants depending on Navajo Nation coal would be unlikely.

During the winter session, the Navajo Nation Council approve a resolution supporting the necessary reciprocal credit.

PD/prr