NOTE: As provided in LFC policy, this report is intended for use by the standing finance committees of the legislature.  The Legislative Finance Committee does not assume responsibility for the accuracy of the information in this report when used in any other situation.



Only the most recent FIR version, excluding attachments, is available on the Intranet. Previously issued FIRs and attachments may be obtained from the LFC office in Suite 101 of the State Capitol Building North.



F I S C A L I M P A C T R E P O R T



SPONSOR: Stewart DATE TYPED: 2/12/01 HB 213
SHORT TITLE: Safe School Program SB
ANALYST: Gilbert


APPROPRIATION



Appropriation Contained
Estimated Additional Impact
Recurring

or Non-Rec

Fund

Affected

FY01 FY02 FY01 FY02
$ 1,000.0 Recurring General Fund



(Parenthesis ( ) Indicate Expenditure Decreases)





REVENUE



Estimated Revenue
Subsequent

Years Impact

Recurring

or Non-Rec

Fund

Affected

FY01 FY02
$ (1,000.0) Recurring General Fund
$ 1,000.0 Recurring New Safe Schools Fund



(Parenthesis ( ) Indicate Revenue Decreases)



SOURCES OF INFORMATION



LFC Files

State Department of Education (SDE)

Legislative Education Study Committee (LESC)

LESC Report to the First Session of the 45th Legislature



SUMMARY



Synopsis of Bill



House Bill 213 appropriates funds to the State Department of Education (SDE) to establish a safe schools program, to provide awards to public schools for the implementation of local comprehensive school safety plans, creates a new "safe schools fund", and makes a $1 million appropriation to the new fund.



Significant Issues



This bill directs the SDE to:







According to the SDE, the accountability program for New Mexico schools includes five statewide indicators. One of the indicators is school safety. Currently, all public schools in New Mexico have developed comprehensive safe schools plans but lack the funding to fully implement these plans.



During the 1999 special session of the State Legislature, $250,000 was appropriated to the SDE for safe schools security needs. Funding was distributed to schools on a competitive basis. Schools, school clusters and/or school districts were eligible to apply for up to $10,000 for safe school security needs. According to the SDE, 155 applications totaling $1.55 million were received from 54 school district.



Currently, a small percentage (15%) of Title IV funds can be utilized for school security. This resource, however, must also be used for other Safe And Drug Free School programs within districts.

FISCAL IMPLICATIONS



The appropriation of $1,000.0 to the newly created Safe Schools Fund is a recurring expense to the general fund.



This bill states that (page 2, lines 22-24) any unexpended or unencumbered balance remaining at the end of FY02 shall revert to the general fund. However, on page 2, lines 13-15, the bill states that any balances in the fund at the end of any fiscal year shall not revert. (See Technical Issues Below)



ADMINISTRATIVE IMPLICATIONS



This bill would create a new project for the SDE to administer and would increase current programmatic duties, fiscal accountability, and oversight responsibilities. However, the SDE believes this can be accomplished with existing staff resources.



TECHNICAL ISSUES



Ambiguity regarding reversion of funds appears to exist in House Bill 213 as outlined below:



(Page 2, lines 17-19) Funds are appropriated from the general fund to the safe schools fund for expenditure in fiscal year 2002 and succeeding fiscal years.



(Page 2, lines 13-15) Any balances in the fund at the end of any fiscal year shall not revert but shall remain credited to the fund.



(Page 2, lines 22-24) Any unexpended or unencumbered balance remaining at the end of fiscal year 2002 shall revert to the general fund.



OTHER SUBSTANTIVE ISSUES



The following is provided for information only. It is not intended as a commentary on the merits of the program/project:



The Legislative Education Study Committee did not recommend funding for this program in their Report to the First Session of the Forty-Fifth Legislature.



LG/njw