NOTE: As provided in LFC policy, this report is intended for use by the standing finance committees of the legislature. The Legislative Finance Committee does not assume responsibility for the accuracy of the information in this report when used in any other situation.
Only the most recent FIR version, excluding attachments, is available on the Intranet. Previously issued FIRs and attachments may be obtained from the LFC office in Suite 101 of the State Capitol Building North.
| SPONSOR: | Wright | DATE TYPED: | 01/24/01 | HB | 58 | ||
| SHORT TITLE: | Defensive Driving School as Alternative | SB | |||||
| ANALYST: | Wilson | ||||||
(Parenthesis ( ) Indicate Expenditure Decreases)
Duplicates/Relates to Appropriation in The General Appropriation Act
| Subsequent
Years Impact |
Recurring
or Non-Rec |
Fund
Affected | ||
| FY01 | FY02 | |||
| See Fiscal
Implications |
||||
(Parenthesis ( ) Indicate Revenue Decreases)
SUMMARY
Synopsis of Bill
???????
PERFORMANCE IMPLICATIONS
This section should explain how the bill will affect the performance of relevant agency programs.
Highlight any relevant performance measures and discuss how performance targets would be impacted by the bill. If the bill would expand a performance-based budgeting program, suggest measures that could be used to assess the effectiveness of the expansion.
Performance measures include output, outcome, efficiency and quality measures.
FISCAL IMPLICATIONS
Continuing Appropriations
This bill creates a new fund and provides for continuing appropriations. The LFC objects to including continuing appropriation language in the statutory provisions for newly created funds. Earmarking reduces the ability of the legislature to establish spending priorities.
DW/prr