NOTE: As provided in LFC policy, this report is intended for use by the standing finance committees of the legislature. The Legislative Finance Committee does not assume responsibility for the accuracy of the information in this report when used in any other situation.
Only the most recent FIR version, excluding attachments, is available on the Intranet. Previously issued FIRs and attachments may be obtained from the LFC office in Suite 101 of the State Capitol Building North.
SPONSOR: | Thompson | DATE TYPED: | 03/08/01 | HB | 14/aHVEC | ||
SHORT TITLE: | Require Voter Identification | SB | |||||
ANALYST: | Woodlee |
Recurring
or Non-Rec |
Fund
Affected | ||||
FY01 | FY02 | FY01 | FY02 | ||
$ 0.0 | $ 0.0 |
(Parenthesis ( ) Indicate Expenditure Decreases)
SOURCES OF INFORMATION
Secretary of State
LFC Files
SUMMARY
Synopsis of HVEC Amendment
The House Voters and Elections Committee amendment to House Bill 14 deletes the proposed requirement of presenting identification or executing a sworn statement. The proposal would then be requiring the existing practice of signatures and would add the penalties provided in the original bill.
Synopsis of Original Bill
House Bill 14 proposes to amend Section 1-12-10 NMSA 1978 to require voters to present one of the following forms of identification:
In addition, the bill provides that if the voter is unable to present such identification, then he/she shall be allowed to vote after executing a statement swearing or affirming the a he or she is the named registered voter. Knowingly providing a false statement in such a case constitutes perjury as provided in Section 30-25-1 NMSA 1978 and voting on the basis of this statements constitutes false voting as provided in Section 1-20-8 NMSA 1978.
Significant Issues
According to the Secretary of State, digital signature technology could resolve the identification issue without requiring certified identification. This is able to be implemented in eight New Mexico counties implementing the Voter Registration and Election Management System (VREMS) for $10.0. However, this would not address the remaining counties yet to implement the VREMS.
FISCAL IMPLICATIONS
No appropriation or significant fiscal implications contained in the bill.
ADMINISTRATIVE IMPLICATIONS
It is possible the voting process could be slightly delayed because of the added task of checking identification cards.
MW/njw