NOTE: As provided in LFC policy, this report is intended for use by the standing finance committees of the legislature.  The Legislative Finance Committee does not assume responsibility for the accuracy of the information in this report when used in any other situation.



Only the most recent FIR version, excluding attachments, is available on the Intranet. Previously issued FIRs and attachments may be obtained from the LFC office in Suite 101 of the State Capitol Building North.





F I S C A L I M P A C T R E P O R T





SPONSOR: Carraro DATE TYPED: 01/26/99 HB
SHORT TITLE: Elect Judges and Justices, CA SB SJR 6
ANALYST: O'Connell


APPROPRIATION



Appropriation Contained
Estimated Additional Impact
Recurring

or Non-Rec

Fund

Affected

FY00 FY01 FY00 FY01
NFI NFI



(Parenthesis ( ) Indicate Expenditure Decreases)



Duplicates/Conflicts with/Companion to/Relates to



SOURCES OF INFORMATION



LFC files

Administrative Office of the Courts (AOC) analysis

Attorney General analysis



SUMMARY



Synopsis of Bill



Senate Joint Resolution 6 proposes that New Mexico's constitutional provisions on selecting and retaining judges be amended to allow for the election of the state's justices and judges, including Supreme Court justices, Court of Appeals judges, and district court, metropolitan and magistrate judges. Also, the Resolution repeals the various constitutional provisions on retention or rejection of judges at general elections, judicial vacancies, and nominating commissions.



TECHNICAL ISSUES



The Attorney General suggests making the language to describe the election of various judges more consistent.



BOC/njw