NOTE: As provided in LFC policy, this report is intended for use by the standing finance committees of the legislature. The Legislative Finance Committee does not assume responsibility for the accuracy of the information in this report when used in any other situation.
Only the most recent FIR version, excluding attachments, is available on the Intranet. Previously issued FIRs and attachments may be obtained from the LFC office in Suite 101 of the State Capitol Building North.
SPONSOR: | Carraro | DATE TYPED: | 01/26/99 | HB | |||
SHORT TITLE: | Elect Judges and Justices, CA | SB | SJR 6 | ||||
ANALYST: | O'Connell |
Recurring
or Non-Rec |
Fund
Affected | ||||
FY00 | FY01 | FY00 | FY01 | ||
NFI | NFI | ||||
(Parenthesis ( ) Indicate Expenditure Decreases)
Duplicates/Conflicts with/Companion to/Relates to
SOURCES OF INFORMATION
LFC files
Administrative Office of the Courts (AOC) analysis
Attorney General analysis
SUMMARY
Synopsis of Bill
Senate Joint Resolution 6 proposes that New Mexico's constitutional provisions on selecting and retaining judges be amended to allow for the election of the state's justices and judges, including Supreme Court justices, Court of Appeals judges, and district court, metropolitan and magistrate judges. Also, the Resolution repeals the various constitutional provisions on retention or rejection of judges at general elections, judicial vacancies, and nominating commissions.
TECHNICAL ISSUES
The Attorney General suggests making the language to describe the election of various judges more consistent.
BOC/njw