NOTE: As provided in LFC policy, this report is intended for use by the standing finance committees of the legislature.  The Legislative Finance Committee does not assume responsibility for the accuracy of the information in this report when used in any other situation.



Only the most recent FIR version, excluding attachments, is available on the Intranet. Previously issued FIRs and attachments may be obtained from the LFC office in Suite 101 of the State Capitol Building North.





F I S C A L I M P A C T R E P O R T





SPONSOR: Tsosie DATE TYPED: 02/04/00 HB
SHORT TITLE: San Juan Magistrate District Precincts SB 432
ANALYST: Woodlee


APPROPRIATION



Appropriation Contained
Estimated Additional Impact
Recurring

or Non-Rec

Fund

Affected

FY00 FY01 FY00 FY01
NFI NFI



(Parenthesis ( ) Indicate Expenditure Decreases)



Conflicts with Senate Bill 397



SOURCES OF INFORMATION



LFC files

Administrative Office of the Courts (AOC) analysis



SUMMARY



Synopsis of Bill



Senate Bill 432 provides that there shall be four magistrate divisions in the San Juan magistrate district (one for each judge) operating as two separate courts in Farmington and Aztec. The bill states that magistrates in this district shall not be elected at large from the district, but from the division for which the magistrate sits. San Juan magistrates will have district-wide jurisdiction.

Significant Issues



The bill provides for the composition of the four magistrate divisions by precinct:





FISCAL IMPLICATIONS



There is no appropriation or fiscal impact associated with this bill.



CONFLICT/DUPLICATION/COMPANIONSHIP/RELATIONSHIP



Senate Bill 432 conflicts with Senate Bill 397. Both bills provide for the four districts in San Juan County; however, each district is composed of different precinct numbers.



MW/prr