NOTE: As provided in LFC policy, this report is intended for use by the standing finance committees of the legislature.  The Legislative Finance Committee does not assume responsibility for the accuracy of the information in this report when used in any other situation.



Only the most recent FIR version, excluding attachments, is available on the Intranet. Previously issued FIRs and attachments may be obtained from the LFC office in Suite 101 of the State Capitol Building North.





F I S C A L I M P A C T R E P O R T





SPONSOR: Wilson DATE TYPED: 02/03/00 HB
SHORT TITLE: Drip Irrigation Systems SB 320
ANALYST: Pickering


APPROPRIATION



Appropriation Contained
Estimated Additional Impact
Recurring

or Non-Rec

Fund

Affected

FY00 FY01 FY00 FY01
NFI $ 2,000.0 NFI NFI Nonrecurring IWCF



(Parenthesis ( ) Indicate Expenditure Decreases)



SOURCES OF INFORMATION



New Mexico Department of Agriculture (NMDA)

Office of the State Engineer / Interstate Stream Commission (OSE/ISC)



SUMMARY



Synopsis of Bill



SB320 appropriates $2,000.0 from the irrigation works construction fund (IWCF) to ISC in FY2001 to contract with agricultural water users for the purchase, construction, improvement or installation of drip irrigation systems.



Significant Issues



According to ISC, the IWCF balances must be preserved to address other critical programs deemed priority by both the agency and the legislature. The funds are designated for use by the legislature to augment general fund revenue sources for important needs such as: the lower Rio Grande hydrographic survey, federal and interstate litigation in the lower Rio Grande, Endangered Species Act litigation and process participation in the middle Rio Grande.



FISCAL IMPLICATIONS

SB320 appropriates $2,000.0 from the IWCF. The projected IWCF income fund balance at the end of the current fiscal year is $16,700.0. However, ISC has requested $8,359.0 in FY2001 appropriations from the fund to address several high priority issues previously listed. It is the agency's contention that these monies are obligated for specific purposes and will be depleted if used for other concerns.



ADMINISTRATIVE IMPLICATIONS



ISC maintains that administrative efforts would increase to contract and administer the new program. The bill lacks authorization for additional personnel, which is not a legitimate use of

the IWCF, and would have to be funded by a general fund appropriation increase not contemplated in the agency's budget request. Also, the new program could require that personnel time dedicated to ongoing programs be deferred unless additional FTE funding is appropriated from the general fund.



TECHNICAL ISSUES



The bill presumes that ISC can contract with individuals for this activity, which it cannot. The agency is authorized to loan funds to political subdivisions of the state.



SUBSTANTIVE ISSUES



See Significant Issues and Fiscal Implications, above.



ALTERNATIVES



ISC offered two proposals which include: 1. Amending the bill to authorize the loan of funds to districts for the purpose of construction of drip irrigation systems, in addition to appropriations for existing ISC loan program and, 2. Appropriating general fund monies and authorizing ISC to enter a cooperative agreement with another agency or public entity to construct a drip irrigation demonstration project.



RP/njw