NOTE: As provided in LFC policy, this report is intended for use by the standing finance committees of the legislature. The Legislative Finance Committee does not assume responsibility for the accuracy of the information in this report when used in any other situation.
Only the most recent FIR version, excluding attachments, is available on the Intranet. Previously issued FIRs and attachments may be obtained from the LFC office in Suite 101 of the State Capitol Building North.
SPONSOR: | Feldman | DATE TYPED: | 02/05/00 | HB | |||
SHORT TITLE: | Health Insurance Income Tax Deduction | SB | 61/aSWMC | ||||
ANALYST: | Williams |
Subsequent
Years Impact |
Recurring
or Non-Rec |
Fund
Affected | ||
FY00 | FY01 | |||
See Narrative |
Recurring | General Fund |
(Parenthesis ( ) Indicate Revenue Decreases)
Duplicates/Conflicts with/Companion to/Relates to
SOURCES OF INFORMATION
Health Policy Commission (HPC)
Taxation and Revenue Department (TRD)
SUMMARY
Synopsis of SWMC Amendment
The Senate Ways and Means Committee amendments make three changes to the original bill: 1) a technical change to clarify the applicability of insurance; 2) caps the amount of the deduction to $1,000 per exemption and 3) adds Medicare Part B premiums to the list of eligible insurance.
Synopsis of Original Bill
Endorsed by the Legislative Health and Human Services Committee. Authorizes an income tax deduction from net income for state personal income tax purposes for premiums paid for health insurance for the taxpayer and dependents during the tax year. The deduction could not be claimed to the extent premiums have been excluded from the taxpayer's adjusted gross income or those amounts are itemized for federal tax purposes. Eligible health insurance includes medical, dental, vision and long-term care. Married filing separately would split the deduction. Applies to tax year 2000 and beyond.
FISCAL IMPLICATIONS
There is considerable uncertainty on the magnitude of potential revenue loss resulting from this legislation due to the following factors:
The first uncertainty is the potential amount of premiums deductible. Based on Health Policy Commission data for New Mexico, TRD estimated an average per capita premium of $1,200 in its original bill analysis. HPC noted their 1999 household survey showed typical 1998 payments/contributions for health care premiums were close to $2,000 per year for families and over $1,000 for individuals. However, according to a 1996 survey noted by TRD, total private sector health premiums reflected averages paid the by employee of approximately $510. Further, in a national study by Lewin and Associates, premium and out-of-pocket payments for health care were on average, for an entire family, estimated from $229 to $1,239 depending on income.
TRD does not yet have data available on the fiscal impact of the amendments. An updated LFC report will be released after receipt of the TRD analysis.
ADMINISTRATIVE IMPLICATIONS
This technically difficult deduction would potentially require significant audit activity which would be difficult to address under current funding levels. TRD estimates annual cost for auditing to ensure compliance with these provisions of $3,500.0 per year for four years.
OTHER SUBSTANTIVE ISSUES
HPC notes in 1998 about 14% of New Mexico adults had no health care coverage for the entire year and about 7.1% had coverage for only part of the year. The most common reason cited for lack of health care coverage was affordability. This group is disproportionately weighted towards households with lower incomes.
AW/gm