NOTE: As provided in LFC policy, this report is intended for use by the standing finance committees of the legislature.  The Legislative Finance Committee does not assume responsibility for the accuracy of the information in this report when used in any other situation.



Only the most recent FIR version, excluding attachments, is available on the Intranet. Previously issued FIRs and attachments may be obtained from the LFC office in Suite 101 of the State Capitol Building North.





F I S C A L I M P A C T R E P O R T





SPONSOR: Feldman DATE TYPED: 02/05/00 HB
SHORT TITLE: Health Insurance Income Tax Deduction SB 61/aSWMC
ANALYST: Williams


REVENUE



Estimated Revenue
Subsequent

Years Impact

Recurring

or Non-Rec

Fund

Affected

FY00 FY01

See Narrative

Recurring General Fund

(Parenthesis ( ) Indicate Revenue Decreases)



Duplicates/Conflicts with/Companion to/Relates to



SOURCES OF INFORMATION



Health Policy Commission (HPC)

Taxation and Revenue Department (TRD)



SUMMARY



Synopsis of SWMC Amendment



The Senate Ways and Means Committee amendments make three changes to the original bill: 1) a technical change to clarify the applicability of insurance; 2) caps the amount of the deduction to $1,000 per exemption and 3) adds Medicare Part B premiums to the list of eligible insurance.



Synopsis of Original Bill



Endorsed by the Legislative Health and Human Services Committee. Authorizes an income tax deduction from net income for state personal income tax purposes for premiums paid for health insurance for the taxpayer and dependents during the tax year. The deduction could not be claimed to the extent premiums have been excluded from the taxpayer's adjusted gross income or those amounts are itemized for federal tax purposes. Eligible health insurance includes medical, dental, vision and long-term care. Married filing separately would split the deduction. Applies to tax year 2000 and beyond.



FISCAL IMPLICATIONS



There is considerable uncertainty on the magnitude of potential revenue loss resulting from this legislation due to the following factors:

TRD does not yet have data available on the fiscal impact of the amendments. An updated LFC report will be released after receipt of the TRD analysis.



ADMINISTRATIVE IMPLICATIONS



This technically difficult deduction would potentially require significant audit activity which would be difficult to address under current funding levels. TRD estimates annual cost for auditing to ensure compliance with these provisions of $3,500.0 per year for four years.



OTHER SUBSTANTIVE ISSUES



HPC notes in 1998 about 14% of New Mexico adults had no health care coverage for the entire year and about 7.1% had coverage for only part of the year. The most common reason cited for lack of health care coverage was affordability. This group is disproportionately weighted towards households with lower incomes.



AW/gm