NOTE: As provided in LFC policy, this report is intended for use by the standing finance committees of the legislature.  The Legislative Finance Committee does not assume responsibility for the accuracy of the information in this report when used in any other situation.



Only the most recent FIR version, excluding attachments, is available on the Intranet. Previously issued FIRs and attachments may be obtained from the LFC office in Suite 101 of the State Capitol Building North.



F I S C A L I M P A C T R E P O R T



SPONSOR: Dana DATE TYPED: 02/10/00 HB 152/aHJC
SHORT TITLE: Protection of Mails Act SB
ANALYST: O'Connell

APPROPRIATION



Appropriation Contained
Estimated Additional Impact
Recurring

or Non-Rec

Fund

Affected

FY00 FY01 FY00 FY01
NFI NFI

(Parenthesis ( ) Indicate Expenditure Decreases)

SOURCES OF INFORMATION



LFC files

Administrative Office of the Courts (AOC)



SUMMARY



Synopsis of HJC Amendment



The House Judiciary Committee amendment strikes the use of the word "knowingly" and replaces it with the word "intentionally."



Synopsis of Bill



House Bill 152 enacts a new section of the Criminal Code entitled the Protection of Mails Act. The bill would provide new criminal offenses related to the obstruction of the mails or mail carriers, destruction of letter boxes or mail, or theft of mail.



Offenders who obstruct, destroy or steal mail in an amount less than $100 would be guilty of a petty misdemeanor. Mail theft that involves mail valued over $100 but less than $1.0 is guilty of a misdemeanor; more than $1.0 but less than $2.5 a fourth degree felony; more than $2.5 but less than $20.0 a third degree felony; and over $20.0 a second degree felony.

Significant Issues



House Bill 152 would offer affirmative defenses where the defendant was unaware that the property was that of another, the defendant reasonably believed that he or she was entitled to the property involved or had a right to acquire or dispose of it, or the property belonged to the defendant's lawful spouse, unless they were not living together as husband and wife and were living in separate residences.



BOC/njw:gm