NOTE: As provided in LFC policy, this report is intended for use by the standing finance committees of the legislature. The Legislative Finance Committee does not assume responsibility for the accuracy of the information in this report when used in any other situation.
Only the most recent FIR version, excluding attachments, is available on the Intranet. Previously issued FIRs and attachments may be obtained from the LFC office in Suite 101 of the State Capitol Building North.
| SPONSOR: | Stell | DATE TYPED: | 03/15/00 | HB | 146/aHTRC | ||
| SHORT TITLE: | Agricultural Products Tax Deduction | SB | |||||
| ANALYST: | Eaton | ||||||
| Subsequent
Years Impact |
Recurring
or Non-Rec |
Fund
Affected | ||
| FY00 | FY01 | |||
| $ (90.0) | Recurring | General Fund | ||
| $ 0.0 | Recurring | Local Governments | ||
(Parenthesis ( ) Indicate Revenue Decreases)
SOURCES OF INFORMATION
Taxation and Revenue Department (TRD)
SUMMARY
Synopsis of HTRC amendment
The HTRC amendment includes testing of milk to the activities the would be permitted to have the gross receipts tax deduction. Previously, the language (inadvertently it seems) excluded testing milk for the producer and non-profit marketing association from the deduction.
Synopsis of Bill
This bill adds "transporting milk for the producer or nonprofit marketing association from the farm to a milk processing or dairy product manufacturing plant" and "testing or other preparation"list of agricultural services allowed a gross receipts deduction. This list includes reaping, harvesting, ginning, etc.
FISCAL IMPLICATIONS
This bill would have an estimated negative impact on the general fund of $90.0 (recurring).
The 1992 Economic Census of Transportation Industries indicates that in 1992, 306M ton-miles of primary, unprocessed agricultural commodities were hauled in the state. 49% of the value of these crops, animals and produce were hauled by for-hire carriers, with an additional 7% of the value hauled by mixed private and for-hire modalities. Using 6¢ per ton-mile for agricultural short-hauls, indicates that 1992 for-hire revenues were about $10.3 million. An estimated 80% of this revenue was in intrastate commerce, and therefore taxable. The remaining 20% is deductible under an existing deduction from gross receipts tax for receipts from hauling in interstate commerce. Further, an estimated 12.5% of unprocessed farm product transportation is devoted to hauling milk from farm to factory. The estimate above includes all these factors. Industry representatives have testified that this revenue has not been remitted to the state. TRD had not submitted an analysis of the amendment at the time this report was completed.
ADMINISTRATIVE IMPLICATIONS
Minimal.
TECHNICAL ISSUES
Taxation and Revenue Department report that this bill is in response to an audit and assessment of a for-hire milk hauler. They report that this bill will not affect the outcome of the protest of this issue.
JBE/gm