NOTE: As provided in LFC policy, this report is intended for use by the standing finance committees of the legislature. The Legislative Finance Committee does not assume responsibility for the accuracy of the information in this report when used in any other situation.
Only the most recent FIR version, excluding attachments, is available on the Intranet. Previously issued FIRs and attachments may be obtained from the LFC office in Suite 101 of the State Capitol Building North.
SPONSOR: | Whitaker | DATE TYPED: | 02/11/00 | HB | 10 | ||
SHORT TITLE: | Irrevocable Letter of Credit | SB | |||||
ANALYST: | Valenzuela |
Recurring
or Non-Rec |
Fund
Affected | ||||
FY00 | FY01 | FY00 | FY01 | ||
NFI |
(Parenthesis ( ) Indicate Expenditure Decreases)
Duplicates/Conflicts with/Companion to/Relates to
SOURCES OF INFORMATION
LFC Files
Energy, Minerals and Natural Resources Department (EMNRD)
SUMMARY
Synopsis of Bill
House Bill 10 amends a section of the Oil and Gas Act (70-2-14 NMSA 1978) to allow the use of "an irrevocable letter of credit" to satisfy the bonding requirement in the act. The requirement is a condition of operating oil and gas wells in the state. Currently, the law permits the use of cash and surety bonds as acceptable types of financial assurance for the plugging of oil, gas and service wells.
Significant Issues
Two major issues are addressed by the bill; difficulty in obtaining bonding to cover plugging liabilities and whether the state's risk would be increased by accepting letters of credit.
EMNRD staff concludes that operators who may encounter difficulty in finding bonding would be aided by the use of irrevocable letters of credit. The use of irrevocable letters of credit could also prove to be lower in cost than bonding.
The state's risk is not increased by accepting irrevocable letters of credit is the conclusion drawn by EMNRD staff. However, the suggest that steps can be taken to minimize any risk the state might have.
MV/sb