Fiscal impact reports (FIRs) are prepared by the Legislative Finance Committee (LFC) for standing finance
committees of the NM Legislature. The LFC does not assume responsibility for the accuracy of these reports
if they are used for other purposes.
Current FIRs (in HTML & Adobe PDF formats) are a vailable on the NM Legislative Website (legis.state.nm.us).
Adobe PDF versions include all attachments, whereas HTML versions may not. Previously issued FIRs and
attachments may be obtained from the LFC in Suite 101 of the State Capitol Building North.
F I S C A L I M P A C T R E P O R T
SPONSOR Griego
ORIGINAL DATE
LAST UPDATED
2-22-2007
2-26-2007 HB
SHORT TITLE School Closure Moratorium
SB 1126/aSEC/aSCONC/aSFL#1
ANALYST Dearing
APPROPRIATION (dollars in thousands)
Appropriation
Recurring
or Non-Rec
Fund
Affected
FY07
FY08
*NFI Non-Recurring
General Fund
*Please see narrative
(Parenthesis ( ) Indicate Expenditure Decreases)
Relates to appropriations in the General Appropriation Act
SOURCES OF INFORMATION
LFC Files
Responses Received From
Attorney General’s Office (AGO)
Public Education Department (PED)
SUMMARY
Synopsis of Senate Floor Amendment #1
Action on the Senate Floor amends Senate Bill 1126/aSEC/aSCONC such that;
1. Strike Senate Conservation Committee Amendment 1.
2. On page 1, line 20, strike "shall" and insert in lieu thereof "may be closed by a majority
plus one vote if all members of the school board are present and voting or may".
Senate Floor amendments alter the criteria of a school-closing vote from unanimous to a super-
majority of one over the majority of local school board members.
pg_0002
Senate Bill 1126/aSEC/aSCONC/aSFL#1 – Page
2
Synopsis of SCONC Amendment
The Senate Conservation Committee amends Senate Bill 1126/aSEC such that;
1.) On page, 1, line 20, strike “shall" and insert in lieu thereof “may be closed by unanimous
vote if all members of the school board are present and voting or may".
2.) On page 1, line 24, after “board" and insert in lieu thereof a comma.
3.) On page 2, line 2, after “affiliation" insert “, by simple majority vote".
Senate Conservation Committee amendments make minor changes to the proposed legislation,
thereby clarifying its intention. The amendments allow provisions for maintaining local school
board autonomy in decisions regarding closing schools.
Synopsis of SEC Amendment
The Senate Education Committee amends Senate Bill 1126 such that;
1. On page 1, line 24, strike "six" and insert in lieu thereof "five".
2. On page 2, strike lines 12 through 14 in their entirety and renumber the succeeding
paragraphs accordingly.
3. On page 3, line 3, strike "six" and insert in lieu thereof "five".
4. On page 3, line 10, strike "six" and insert in lieu thereof "five" and strike "eight" and insert
in lieu thereof "seven".,
Senate Education Committee amendments makes a slight change to the proposed legislation,
thereby altering the legislation. The intent of the changes are such that one of the previously
mentioned conditions for consideration of school closing is removed from the bill. Identification
of a school for restructuring 2 under the Public Education department’s improvement system has
been removed from the list of criteria signaling a school for consideration for closure.
Additionally, the text of Senate Bill 1126/aSEC has been altered such that with the removal of
that criteria, now only 5 of 7 criteria would need to be met in order to trigger the notification and
probationary period process laid out in the provisions of the bill.
Synopsis of Original Bill
Senate Bill 1126 carries no appropriation.
The bill establishes a list of eight criteria signaling a school for consideration for closure. If a
school meets 6 of 8 items, there is a notification and 2 year probation. If the school fails to
improve in any areas, it can be closed.
FISCAL IMPLICATIONS
Senate Bill 1126 does not appear to contain an appropriation component, however, the Attorney
General Office notes that by providing any additional funding to local school districts to continue
pg_0003
Senate Bill 1126/aSEC/aSCONC/aSFL#1 – Page
3
to operate schools designated for closure, the bill circumvents calculations resulting in the state
equalization guarantee distribution for school district operating revenue as set forth in NMSA
Section 22-8-25.
SIGNIFICANT ISSUES
If Senate Bill 1126 is enacted, a local school board may close a school within a two-year period
if six of the following criteria are met:
(1) The school has an enrollment, on the eightieth enrollment day of the most recent
school year, of less than seventy-five percent of the school's maximum students
capacity published by the school district's administration, excluding portable
classrooms;
(2) The percentage of students living within a school's attendance area that are
enrolled in that school on the eightieth day, determined by dividing the number of
students living within a school area attending their assigned school divided by the
total number of students living within the school zone is less than seventy percent;
(3) The school has been identified as restructuring 2 under the department's school
improvement system;
(4) The school facility is considered functionally obsolete;
(5) More than ten years have elapsed since the last facility upgrades or remodels in
excess of five hundred thousand dollars ($500,000);
(6) The current facility is out of conformity to building or safety codes;
(7) The current facility needs upgrades or remodeling that exceeds five hundred
thousand dollars ($500,000) in cost; and
(8) There has been a cumulative drop of twenty-five percent or more in the
enrollment of pre-school and school-age children during the prior three-year
period.
If a public school meets six of the eight conditions listed, the school's principal, teachers,
students, parents and neighborhood shall be formally notified of the school's eligibility for
closure, the school shall be placed on probation and shall have the following two academic
school years to improve its standing in these areas. If the school is re-assessed and no longer
meets 6 of the criteria, it will not be closed.
Testimony throughout the summer regarding funding formula impacts on districts indicates that
student enrollment declines are having a devastating impact on medium size districts with a low
Training and Experience Index (T&E). Many school districts have worked to cut budgets, staff
and other operational expenses and are still falling significantly short in operating budgets.
Further testimony indicated that although the Legislature appropriates sufficient funding to meet
school district needs, when it flows through the formula, a number of districts receive less
funding than is needed to meet operating expenses while other districts receive more than
needed. The funding formula study task force is working on changes to the funding formula and
is expected to make recommendations to the Legislature in early fall 07 2008 and will make
recommendations to the Legislature in time for the 2008 session.
PD/csd