NOTE: As provided in LFC policy, this report is
intended only for use by the standing finance committees of the
legislature. The Legislative Finance Committee does not assume
responsibility for the accuracy of the information in this report when used for
other purposes.
The most recent FIR
version (in HTML & Adobe PDF formats) is available on the Legislative
Website. The Adobe PDF version includes
all attachments, whereas the HTML version does not. Previously issued FIRs and attachments may be
obtained from the LFC in
SPONSOR: |
HBIC |
DATE TYPED: |
|
HB |
1003/HBICS |
||
SHORT TITLE: |
Amend Workers’ Comp Act |
SB |
|
||||
|
ANALYST: |
Collard |
|||||
APPROPRIATION
Appropriation
Contained |
Estimated
Additional Impact |
Recurring or
Non-Rec |
Fund Affected |
||
FY03 |
FY04 |
FY03 |
FY04 |
|
|
|
NFI |
|
|
|
|
(Parenthesis
( ) Indicate Expenditure Decreases)
Relates to HB 503
Responses
Received From
Workers’
Compensation Administration
SUMMARY
Synopsis
of Bill
The House Business and
Industry Committee substitute for House Bill 1003 changes the Workers’
Compensation Act pertaining to independent medical examinations and temporary
total disability benefits. In the
committee substitute, if an employee returns to work before the date of maximum
medical improvement and the employer offers a wage less than the worker’s
pre-injury wage, the worker is entitled to temporary total disability benefits
up to two-thirds of the difference between the pre- and post-injury wages. The committee substitute also allows a party
to petition for an independent medical examination if the reasonableness or
necessity of treatment, or causation, of the injury is questioned.
FISCAL IMPLICATIONS
There is no
appropriation or fiscal implication associated with the committee substitute
for House Bill 1003.
ADMINISTRATIVE IMPLICATIONS
The Workers’
Compensation Administration anticipates additional independent medical examinations
and additional investigations of the practice of receiving temporary total
disability benefits while working for another employer; however, the department
indicates the additional work is absorbable by present staff.
RELATIONSHIP
The committee
substitute for House Bill 1003 relates to House Bill 503, as both bills deal
with temporary total disability compensation benefits.
TECHNICAL ISSUES
The Workers’ Compensation Administration notes page
3, lines 1 through 5, are unclear whether the independent medical examinations
can be used to help resolve a conflict among health care providers about the
extent of impairment. The department
indicates this is a frequent current use of independent medical examinations.
OTHER SUBSTANTIVE ISSUES
The Workers’
Compensation Administration notes the committee substitute reverses two
judicial decisions: Grubelnik v. Four-Four, Inc., relating to temporary
total disability benefits and Ramirez v. IBP Prepared Foods, Inc.,
relating to independent medical examiners.
The
committee substitute changes “the employer” on page 2, line 2 to “any
employer.” In Grubelnik v. Four-Four,
Inc., a worker who had not been released to return to work and was receiving
temporary total disability benefits went to work for another employer doing the
same work. This behavior was approved because
of a technical reading of the statute, where in the past it had been
successfully prosecuted as fraud. The
change of wording in the bill undoes the Grubelnik v. Four-Four, Inc.
decision.
The
department also notes, other than limiting the scope of disputes upon which the
independent medical examination may be used, the committee substitute for House
Bill 1003 is specifically intended to overturn the decision of Concepcion Ramirez
v. IBP Prepared Foods, Inc. In Concepcion
Ramirez v. IBP Prepared Foods, Inc., the court refused to allow an
independent medical examination to take place when the judge felt it would have
assisted him in making a determination of contested issues, due to wording in
the present statute.
KBC/njw