NOTE: As provided in LFC policy, this report is
intended only for use by the standing finance committees of the
legislature. The Legislative Finance Committee does not assume
responsibility for the accuracy of the information in this report when used for
other purposes.
The most recent FIR
version (in HTML & Adobe PDF formats) is available on the Legislative
Website. The Adobe PDF version includes
all attachments, whereas the HTML version does not. Previously issued FIRs and attachments may be
obtained from the LFC in
SPONSOR: |
Robinson |
DATE
TYPED: |
|
HB |
|
||
SHORT
TITLE: |
Net
Capital Gain Deduction for Business |
SB |
442 |
||||
|
ANALYST: |
Smith |
|||||
REVENUE
Estimated Revenue |
Subsequent Years Impact |
Recurring or
Non-Rec |
Fund Affected |
|
FY03 |
FY04 |
|
|
|
|
(1,140.0) |
(2,330.0) |
Recurring |
General Fund |
|
|
|
|
|
(Parenthesis ( ) Indicate Revenue Decreases)
Responses
Received From
TRD
SUMMARY
Synopsis of Bill
Senate Bill 442 proposes
to eliminate the state personal income tax on net capital gains income attributable
to the sale of a closely-held business.
Under present law taxpayers can deduct up to $1,000 per year in net
capital gains income. The proposal would
modify the present law language to allow a deduction for “the greater of” the
current deduction or the taxpayer’s net capital gain from a closely-held
business. To qualify for the deduction a
taxpayer must sell (1) their entire interest in the business in a transaction
in which substantially all of the equity interests are sold, or (2) the
business must effectively sell all of its assets.
FISCAL
IMPLICATIONS
TRD notes the estimate
assumes
CONFLICT,
DUPLICATION, COMPANIONSHIP, RELATIONSHIP
This bill would conflict with both HB167 and
SB167.
OTHER
SUBSTANTIVE ISSUES
TRD
notes that SB 442 discriminates against interstate commerce because it applies
only to capital gains that would be allocated or apportioned to
Under
federal income tax statutes, state income tax payments are deductible for
purposes of calculating federal income tax.
Thus, because this proposal would reduce state income tax liabilities,
it would also reduce these deductions, thereby increasing the taxpayer’s
federal income tax liability. This
reduces the net benefits of the tax reduction for the taxpayer. For example, if a taxpayer is in the 30% tax
bracket, the net benefit to the taxpayer of the state tax reduction would be
reduced by 30%.
SS/njw